re: New Ahmaud Arbery video from 2017

quote:

---

What a ridiculous cop out. Did you know the elderly couple that was gunned down in the cemetary in cold blood? If not, why do you care? GTFOOH with this shite.

---

Why is black-on-white murders so out of proportion in relation to population percentages or white on black murder?

How many black people have been killed by white people in America since Ahmaud the jogger? Without even doing research I can name 14 white people killed by blacks. Three black on white killings in the last 7 days.

Is it the black fragility that is causing them to attack an 85 year old, an 86 year old and an 80 year old of which two were women.

Black people are extremely lucky that white people have put up with this shite for as long as they have.

People talk all kinds of shite about Dylann Roof but the crazy thing is if you really look at his Manifesto you can't refute the facts he states.

And for all you pussies that get all outraged at the mention of Storm Roof don't be a hypocrite now because you have to remember Emanuel Samson.

He attempted to one-up Dylann Storm Roof and if he weren't confronted how many of the 43 white people over 70 years of age in that church would he have killed?

That is another weird clip. Seems like a lot of harassment of a dude for simply being in a public park.

You brought all this on yourself with your tiny little mind. You must be a real pleasure to know in person. Mercy.

quote:

---

Was he jogging in this video too?

---

wondering the same

quote:

---

I think the point is he wasn’t just some innocent law abiding jogger

---

But he kinda was. He was trespassing to drink water, if you want to criminalize that but its ridiculous.

McDumbass Sr is supposed to be a veteran "investigator" and he saw the previous videos that not only indicated that nothing was stolen, they show him going to where the water spigot is (off camera frame), water can be heard running and Arbery returns on camera wiping his lips then lo and behold he takes a couple steps out and "eases into a jog and disappears from view"...

McDumbass is the worst fricking investigator on the fricking planet and oh, by the way, he lost his right to do it for dereliction of his duty as a LEO...Twice

Lets turn this around - the McMaster(?)s made a mistake - they pursued a burglary suspect with weapons. (possibly they knew the thug from years of past encounters just like the one in this video - a druggie with a bad attitude) = the rationale for their having weapons is arguable - none of us know the history behind it.

Arbury was not out for a "jog" - he did not live in that area, so he had to go there purposely for his 'jog' - the most logical reason was that he was 'cashing the area.'

The men were advised of a break-in (whether that was legitimate or not is immaterial at this point - possibly grounds for some action if illegitamate and things turned out 'normal')

So the guys pursue Arbury (that is not a pretext or harbinger of murder)

And when the confrontation takes place, Arbury attacks the guy with the shotgun. It appears to me that he purposefully went around the truck to passenger side to perhaps attack him from his back - At this point - if he feared for his life - he could have run into away from the scene, creating distance from the weapon are requiring the 'murderer' to shoot him in the back as he ran from the scene.

BUT - he chose to attack the man with the shotgun face to face - fairly congruent with his past behavior when confronted by police as shown in this video.

The evidence suggests that the man did not 'pull the trigger' - the shotgun went off in the struggle initiated by Arbury - HE was the one with the barrel of the gun in his hands tugging and jerking on it - pulling it toward himself instead of pushing the barrel away from him. At any moment prior to that encounter, the man could have actually murdered him by simply pulling the trigger - the close range (created by Arbury) would have made it almost impossible to miss. But he didn't pull the trigger - completely abolishing the theory of "hunting down an innocent black man to murder" theory.

Arbury was a thug - if he had been gunned down on purpose - shot in the back on the streets of Detroit or Chicago - his death would not even be a blip in the news cycle. Nobody would have cared, maybe his momma would have shed a tear, but that would be it.

ONLY because it is some rare instance of white-black interaction does this even matter to the media or the DEMOCRATs - you know that - everyone knows that. THOSE scum pray every night for ANOTHER instance of white/black episodes - and they try to CREATE the climate for them to occur.

SO - my humble opinion - YES the white guys used bad judgement - but also YES - Arbury was a thug and his idiocy in attacking a man with a shotgun and pulling the barrel into his chest was the reason he is dead.

NOW - I would be comfortable with a real discussion about some degree of manslaughter in this case - but any allegation of MURDER is so stupid that I disregard it out of hand - without some sort of further evidence to support it.

SO - continue on with your virtue signaling

quote:

---

other than whether or not those two men had the right to hunt down and slay someone on the street all vigilante justice

---

<== screw that line of 'reason'

quote:

---

Well since the homeowner and his attorney have reviewed all the videos and reported it

---

you think they know he was there for water? why wouldn’t he walk around the outside of the house where spigots normally are? Did he think water would be on in a sink and the house is only in framing stage?
WTF is wrong with you people

quote:

---

you think they know he was there for water?

---

They think that...

LINK

Sometimes on the highway of life, a truck full of dog zhit runs head on into a truck full of cat zhit....

Why can't BOTH parties be zhitty people?