- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Larry English, owner of the house says no robbery committed.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 9:23 pm to bigpetedatiga
Posted on 5/11/20 at 9:23 pm to bigpetedatiga
I don’t think it matters if he actually committed a crime or not...if they had reasonable and probable suspicion through observance that he was committing a crime then technically that would allow them to proceed.
I personally wouldn’t go chase a guy down, but I do think if I saw a man sprinting from a neighbor’s house - a man that was already suspected of previous break-Ins - I think it’s reasonable to assume the guy was committing a crime.
I personally wouldn’t go chase a guy down, but I do think if I saw a man sprinting from a neighbor’s house - a man that was already suspected of previous break-Ins - I think it’s reasonable to assume the guy was committing a crime.
This post was edited on 5/11/20 at 9:25 pm
6
Posted on 5/11/20 at 9:27 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
if they had reasonable and probable suspicion through observance that he was committing a crime then technically that would allow them to proceed.
I thought the statue was you had to be observing said crime and it had to be a felony.
Meaning that I can detain you because you stole a pack of skittles or if I simply I thought you did something.
Regardless, hopefully this puts to rest some of the bs being floated out there. I dont argue he was trespassing, but that would not meet the criteria.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 9:42 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
I personally wouldn’t go chase a guy down, but I do think if I saw a man sprinting from a neighbor’s house - a man that was already suspected of previous break-Ins - I think it’s reasonable to assume the guy was committing a crime.
he was jogging through the neighborhood like he apparently had done pretty regularly
do not give these people the benefit of the doubt
Posted on 5/11/20 at 9:48 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
I personally wouldn’t go chase a guy down, but I do think if I saw a man sprinting from a neighbor’s house
A house under construction?
99% of contractors today do nothing except paperwork. They sub everything out. Site work, slab, framing, MEP, sheetrock, painting, trin carpenters, siding, roofers, etc etc all sub'd out.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 9:49 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
.if they had reasonable and probable suspicion through observance that he was committing a crime
They didn’t observe him on the day of the incident until he ran past their front yard. They tell the police they chased him because their had been a rash of break ins and had seen him on video trespassing EARLIER than the day of the incident.
Posted on 5/11/20 at 10:11 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
.if they had reasonable and probable suspicion through observance that he was committing a crime then technically that would allow them to proceed.
Maybe if they were actually cops.
This post was edited on 5/11/20 at 10:12 pm
Posted on 5/12/20 at 8:10 am to JPLSU1981
quote:
I don’t think it matters if he actually committed a crime or not...if they had reasonable and probable suspicion through observance that he was committing a crime then technically that would allow them to proceed.
No....they had to have direct personal knowledge of him committing a felony....if no crime was committed how is it possible for them to have direct personal knowledge that a felony was committed????
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News