Started By
Message

re: Schefter: Saints sign Taysom to extension

Posted on 4/26/20 at 12:22 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279274 posts
Posted on 4/26/20 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Well there’s an easy reasoning for that. Nobody was gonna give up a first rounder then pay him that.





Bidding started at $4.6mil

No. One. Even. Offered.
This post was edited on 4/26/20 at 12:23 pm
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
72555 posts
Posted on 4/26/20 at 12:24 pm to
...plus the first round pick
Posted by HollierThanThou
Member since Jan 2012
6209 posts
Posted on 4/26/20 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Bidding started at $4.6mil

No. One. Even. Offered.

No.

Bidding started at a first round pick + $4.6 million.
Posted by bonethug0180
Avondale
Member since Jul 2018
4351 posts
Posted on 4/26/20 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Bidding started at $4.6mil

No. One. Even. Offered.


Because first and foremost they would have had to give up a 1st for a player that would be 6-10 years older than a rookie, and bid high enough so the Saints wouldn't match.
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 4/26/20 at 3:37 pm to
Because. They. Knew. Saints. Would. Match.

Saints already proclaimed Taysom as potentially the future, and obviously we resigned him after the fact. So again, there’s no point to extend a 4.7 milly offer that will never go anywhere.

Annndddd teams wouldnt want to lost a draft pick either.


Stop being a troll. Some of these posters actually believe you, and your making shite up with that one.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram