- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: coronavirus found to contain unique “gain-of-function” property “for efficient spreading
Posted on 2/20/20 at 7:42 pm to rds dc
Posted on 2/20/20 at 7:42 pm to rds dc
quote:
Is a scam site that also pushes anti-GMO bs, chemtrails, and other crazy stuff. They link a real scientific journal but the research does not appear to imply bioengineering. In an effort to share research in near real time lots of articles are being posted open source and pre-publication. This is releasing a lot of stuff for public consumption that hasn't completed peer review. I would say take anything referencing scientific journal articles with a grain of salt unless you are familiar with the topic, author or you trust the person claiming that the article proves something.
Party pooper
0
Posted on 2/20/20 at 8:48 pm to stout
quote:
Before you say "do we trust China" WHO has taken over the tracking of the spread and deaths and these are their stats
So where does the World Health Organization get it's numbers? Do they have thousands of staff in China counting the various cases of infection, recovery and death? Hell No! They report whatever the Chinese give them and then they stamp it as official and accurate even though they know that it is highly questionable. That's the way these "experts" function.
This post was edited on 2/20/20 at 8:52 pm
Posted on 2/20/20 at 8:59 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
I don’t know whether the source is legit.
It is not.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 4:38 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:Smallpox
Which one?
Posted on 2/21/20 at 4:46 am to stout
quote:My understanding is the WHO officials are locked away in a hotel in Beijing. WHO reporting is based solely on information they are being fed by the Chinese.
Before you say "do we trust China" WHO has taken over the tracking of the spread and deaths and these are their stats
Posted on 2/21/20 at 4:50 am to NC_Tigah
Small pox was used as a biological weapon prior to a vaccine being available to treat it.
Small pox is now controllable. It wasn’t when we gave it to native Americans.
Small pox is now controllable. It wasn’t when we gave it to native Americans.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 5:52 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
When was the last biological weapon used?
Not sure when, but pretty sure it was anthrax.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 5:59 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:It actually was. Vaccination was developed in the 18th Century. Prior to that, immunity was conveyed through survival of the disease. Immune individuals carried contaminated materials to Indian communities. As the tribes were isolated, while they were devastated, further spread was contained and controlled.
Small pox is now controllable. It wasn’t when we gave it to native Americans.
But that is indeed the model for weaponization and control. Develop a vaccine or reliable treatment for your own population. Inoculate your people. Then seed the bioweapon into an unprotected target population.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News