Started By
Message

re: It’s a Hoot Watching the Filth Migrate to a Billionaire Midget

Posted on 2/9/20 at 12:05 am to
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 12:05 am to
quote:

Lol... and one of the most prominent Democratic candidates, Sanders, is a senator from a 98% white flyover state that's 49th in population.

What a fool



What state did Biden use to get to the senate for 40 years?

Did he ever get anywhere near 300,000 votes?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162852 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 12:14 am to
quote:



Who’s doing this? Last I saw, Bloomberg hasn’t even budged the needle past like 1%.



Exactly

Some people just like to imagine things to get pissed off about

This is one of those examples
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 12:17 am to
quote:

Bloomberg is probably the only candidate over there who could beat Trump.
Bloomberg can't come close. Obama is the only person in this country that could beat Trump, but I'm not saying that's a sure thing.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162852 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 12:51 am to
quote:

Obama is the only person in this country that could beat Trump, but I'm not saying that's a sure thing.



Obama would have easily beaten Trump if he was the 2012 challenger
Posted by SavageOrangeJug
Member since Oct 2005
19758 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 1:04 am to
quote:

Obama would have easily beaten Trump if he was the 2012 challenger

Obama is the reason Trump was elected. Trump was the answer to Obama.

I think all but the most insane of Democrats realize Obama was a joke. A media created fraud.

Most people are as fed up with Obama's sorry arse as they are the Clintons.
Posted by Worx
Member since Jan 2020
249 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 1:07 am to
Why did BETO disappear? He was like obozo in 2008?
This post was edited on 2/9/20 at 1:09 am
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
49141 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 1:18 am to
quote:

Berniebots will vote for NO ONE else. Dems either nominate him, or lose 25% of their base.



This is the math that matters

Do Bernie Bros lost by nominating someone else outweigh the Corporate Democrats lost by nominating Bernie?

Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162852 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 1:25 am to
quote:


Obama is the reason Trump was elected. Trump was the answer to Obama.

I think all but the most insane of Democrats realize Obama was a joke. A media created fraud.

Most people are as fed up with Obama's sorry arse as they are the Clintons.

This is complete delusion
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162852 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 1:26 am to
quote:

Berniebots will vote for NO ONE else. Dems either nominate him, or lose 25% of their base.

How do you explain Hillary winning the popular vote in 2016 then? Certainly she should have gotten completely destroyed losing that much of the base
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
31678 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 1:56 am to
I don't know to what exact extent it affected things in 2016, but it appears clear to me that Hillary is still pretty salty over it because she shite talks Bernie on the reg. I assume she doesn't care for the strength and genuineness of his support of her after their primary process concluded. And the resulting loss of potential voters.

I think it would have been on a more concentrated level at key areas within crucial states that would have possibly made a meaningful difference.
This post was edited on 2/9/20 at 1:57 am
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162852 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 1:57 am to
quote:

I don't know to what exact extent it affected things in 2016

I think we can confidently say that she didn't lose 25% of the democratic base though

That's just asinine which seems par for the course for this new moron
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
31678 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 2:20 am to
Yeah, it looks like Trump got about 62.9m and Clinton 65.8m. The numbers don't exactly appear to support 25% of base. That's a bit overzealous. But they still crazy to isolate Bernie's voters, but that's beside the specific point here I guess.
Posted by broski722
Member since Apr 2018
595 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 2:20 am to
Maher would have just cut him off and changed the subject if he started making a good point like that. Same thing he did pretty much the whole interview.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162852 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 2:30 am to
quote:

The numbers don't exactly appear to support 25% of base. That's a bit overzealous.

It's not overzealous. It's downright stupidity.
Posted by King
Deep in the backwoods
Member since Sep 2008
18460 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 3:04 am to
quote:

Bloomberg hasn’t even budged the needle past like 1%


That fricker is spending money on youtube. Damn Near Every fricking Ad!!!
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 7:27 am to
quote:


Bloomberg is probably the only candidate over there who could beat Trump. That's what concerns me.


Trump is unstoppable at this point and mini-Michael Clownberg is laughable as a candidate.

Can you Imagine the political poster of Michael Bloomberg standing next to a Big Gulp and the slogan you only get to pick one...
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 7:31 am to
quote:


Bloomberg is probably the only candidate over there who could beat Trump. That's what concerns me.


Trump is unstoppable at this point and mini-Michael Clownberg is laughable as a candidate.

Can you Imagine the political poster of Michael Bloomberg standing next to a Big Gulp and the slogan you only get to pick one...
Posted by BuckPshrink
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Member since Dec 2018
247 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 7:47 am to
I often hear Hilldawg took the popular vote... A misnomer as over 8-9 million votes were never counted..
(absentee, early, etc...) And how many of those votes were manufactured in DNC safehouses?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
102201 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 7:56 am to
quote:

How do you explain Hillary winning the popular vote in 2016 then? Certainly she should have gotten completely destroyed losing that much of the base


Bernie blessed his assfricking in 2016 and the Dems promised an above board process in 2020 (reduced influence of superdelegates, new leadership).

Burn me once...

If (when) the DNC fricks Bernie again, there absolutely will be a price paid for it.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
41088 posts
Posted on 2/9/20 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Steve Bannon rightly laughed at Bill Maher and his audience for screaming about oligarchs for the past 3 years and then throwing support behind an American oligarch in Mike Bloomberg.


Or railing, for years, about the surveillance state before screeching with approval at the Obama administration using it against critical reporters and opposition candidates.

Or condemning Trump for his overseas business ventures before turning a blind eye to the Clintons, Biden’s, Pelosis, etc... slinging political influence in other countries like candy.

Or concern trolling America over non existent tea party violence then ignoring actual riots murders and beatings by Antifa and BLM
This post was edited on 2/9/20 at 8:32 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram