- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Deep State leaks Iran Intelligence Briefing to NYT
Posted on 1/5/20 at 3:42 am to davyjones
Posted on 1/5/20 at 3:42 am to davyjones
You are correct. The people saying that everything should be public and unredacted don't understand what they are asking for. The classification levels of information are based on the potential damage that could be caused if said information got out or into the wrong hands. The higher the classification, the greater the potential damage.
Posted on 1/5/20 at 5:39 am to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
The entire fourth branch of government needs to be executed.
FIFY
Posted on 1/5/20 at 5:43 am to Nono
quote:
The only way to keep America safe is to exterminate every Democrat. No questions asked. Just eliminate them.
THIS!^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posted on 1/5/20 at 5:52 am to Jjdoc
quote:
17. Before I go back to the pool let me just say the obvious: No one’s trying to downplay Suleimani’s crimes. The question is why now? His whereabouts have been known before.
Shouldn't the question be "Why wasn't he killed before?" Oh, I know. Because he had an ally in the White House in Soetoro.
Posted on 1/5/20 at 8:23 am to VictoryHill
How is this any different from Snowden or WikiLeaks? The publisher needs to be prosecuted.
Posted on 1/5/20 at 8:47 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
It's amazing how this happens all the time yet no charges are ever pressed
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:05 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Can we PLEASE come up with a consistent stance on the intelligence services Trumpkins?
Or how bout we treat each situation rationally, which you are unable to do
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:14 am to jamboybarry
There was so much dumb in that reporting, I almost fell dumber for reading it. Half the shite she reported justifies what we did, the other half was bullshite.
I especially laughed at the parts where she says planning is chaotic because we didn't know where he was...........yeah that's how these things work, we found him and killed him, that doesn't mean things were chaotic. And it was to distract from impeachment? That happened last month, you know, before the embassy was attacked.
I especially laughed at the parts where she says planning is chaotic because we didn't know where he was...........yeah that's how these things work, we found him and killed him, that doesn't mean things were chaotic. And it was to distract from impeachment? That happened last month, you know, before the embassy was attacked.
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:19 am to TerryDawg03
quote:
quote:
But the sources claimed that was not enough evidence of an imminent attack and called the “reading of the intelligence as an illogical leap.”
Did she read her own tweets? Trump was presented it as an option and he took it. Where’s the problem?
The worst part of it is assuming the entire reason was because of an imminent attack. What about the attacks that just happened, that's why I said this shite is dumb.
Posted on 1/5/20 at 10:58 am to Jjdoc
Find the leaker(s) and disappear them.
Posted on 1/5/20 at 11:06 am to Jjdoc
If an administration leader claimed that Intel is reporting that Martians are invading the US would it really be considered "leaking" to say that isn't what the Intel says?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News