Started By
Message

re: Deep State leaks Iran Intelligence Briefing to NYT

Posted on 1/5/20 at 3:42 am to
Posted by broski722
Member since Apr 2018
595 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 3:42 am to
You are correct. The people saying that everything should be public and unredacted don't understand what they are asking for. The classification levels of information are based on the potential damage that could be caused if said information got out or into the wrong hands. The higher the classification, the greater the potential damage.
Posted by LsuFan_1955
Slidell, La
Member since Jul 2013
1796 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 5:39 am to
quote:

The entire fourth branch of government needs to be executed.


FIFY
Posted by LsuFan_1955
Slidell, La
Member since Jul 2013
1796 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 5:43 am to
quote:

The only way to keep America safe is to exterminate every Democrat. No questions asked. Just eliminate them.


THIS!^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posted by VictoryHill
Alabama
Member since Nov 2013
3217 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 5:52 am to
quote:

17. Before I go back to the pool let me just say the obvious: No one’s trying to downplay Suleimani’s crimes. The question is why now? His whereabouts have been known before.

Shouldn't the question be "Why wasn't he killed before?" Oh, I know. Because he had an ally in the White House in Soetoro.
Posted by tenderfoot tigah
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2004
10449 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 8:23 am to
How is this any different from Snowden or WikiLeaks? The publisher needs to be prosecuted.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64832 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 8:47 am to
quote:

It's amazing how this happens all the time yet no charges are ever pressed
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Can we PLEASE come up with a consistent stance on the intelligence services Trumpkins?


Or how bout we treat each situation rationally, which you are unable to do
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:14 am to
There was so much dumb in that reporting, I almost fell dumber for reading it. Half the shite she reported justifies what we did, the other half was bullshite.

I especially laughed at the parts where she says planning is chaotic because we didn't know where he was...........yeah that's how these things work, we found him and killed him, that doesn't mean things were chaotic. And it was to distract from impeachment? That happened last month, you know, before the embassy was attacked.
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:19 am to
quote:

quote:
But the sources claimed that was not enough evidence of an imminent attack and called the “reading of the intelligence as an illogical leap.”


Did she read her own tweets? Trump was presented it as an option and he took it. Where’s the problem?


The worst part of it is assuming the entire reason was because of an imminent attack. What about the attacks that just happened, that's why I said this shite is dumb.
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
19126 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 10:58 am to
Find the leaker(s) and disappear them.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35510 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 11:06 am to
If an administration leader claimed that Intel is reporting that Martians are invading the US would it really be considered "leaking" to say that isn't what the Intel says?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram