- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Shortage of economically attractive partners for unmarried women to marry
Posted on 12/7/19 at 8:20 am to TheFirstSaints
Posted on 12/7/19 at 8:20 am to TheFirstSaints
quote:I can see why some might think this is a possibility.
I'm guessing you're mostly concerned that it creates a permanent ruling class and a permanent under class? Where the kids born to wealthy parents have such a significant advantage even at birth (never mind during the school years) that kids born to working class parents don't have a chance?
But, what I see is a society where women become more and more disposable in terms of partnerships and paradoxically, as they become more affluent themselves, they become essentially ONLY good for one thing to men...………...fricking.
It's funny. Women decided the reasons men used to be attracted to them and want them as partners were all bad...……..so, they've set about eliminating those reasons...…...leaving only the pussy remaining.
What exactly did sociologists looking at this think would happen?
Posted on 12/7/19 at 8:33 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Women decided the reasons men used to be attracted to them and want them as partners were all bad...……..so, they've set about eliminating those reasons...…...leaving only the pussy remaining.
I have often said similar things. Men wanted women who had the skills to keep a home. They wanted a woman who could cook, clean, sew, etc. Women told women that these skills were outdated, so most women abandoned them. Men wanted a woman who was polite, kind, nurturing, and would make them feel relaxed and welcome when they came home from work. Women told women that men need to pull their weight, that women should be competitive and demanding. Men want to eventually become fathers. Women told other women to focus on their careers first and that being “just a a mother” made them somehow less-than.
So, women, by and large, have basically become nagging, insufferable children with no home-making skills, no common-interests, no interesting hobbies other than bad reality tv, no desire to raise children (they might want to have them, but don’t want to raise them personally) and cannot understand why men seem to only be interested in them for casual sex.
Women who make an effort to be interesting to men in ways other than sex attract men’s interests in sex AND other things.
Short version: feminists told women to not care about most of the things men want in relationships other than sex leading to men only being interested in women for sex because they have nothing else worthwhile to offer as human beings.
This post was edited on 12/7/19 at 8:35 am
Posted on 12/7/19 at 8:39 am to ShortyRob
quote:
But, what I see is a society where women become more and more disposable in terms of partnerships and paradoxically, as they become more affluent themselves, they become essentially ONLY good for one thing to men...………...fricking.
see: hookup culture in college
this mindset/culture plus a severe sex ratio imbalance has made a generation of college women nothing more than frick toys
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News