- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/4/19 at 9:08 am to ReauxlTide222
Four constitutional attorneys get to keep the charade going.
Posted on 12/4/19 at 9:10 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
What are the differences in what we jut went through and this hearing?
Different committees.
The judicial is the actual one that should be handling impeachment inquiries. Which is why Schiff's little show was meaningless horseshite.
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 9:10 am
Posted on 12/4/19 at 9:13 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Wait, what is this? What are the differences in what we jut went through and this hearing?
It has now moved to the judiciary committee, which is the committee that will write up the formal impeachment charges. They are questioning biased lawyers now, who will give their biased opinion on why its constitutional for impeachment.
All 3 of the democrat lawyers have previously stated Trump should be impeached, all before the Ukraine inquiry...
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Repubs going to go in dry on these folks.
"Can you please tell us a case where you got someone convicted of a made-up crime, while having no direct evidence?"
Anyone that ever had one of these lawyers prosecute them, will be filing an appeal for biased actions after today
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 9:14 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)