- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Graham: Impeachment 'dead on arrival' in Senate if Dems keep whistleblower from testifying
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:42 am to TBoy
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:42 am to TBoy
quote:you're still far left loon, a liar, and probably a whole lot worse. There is a transcript, along with people who HEARD THE FRICKIN' CALL and none of that says anything even resembled the notorious QPQ,dimwit!!!....oh, by the way, there is a 2nd call also that POTUS said he would release if they like....he's baiting you, so come on, take the bait....damn lunatics
TBoy
0
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:45 am to TBoy
quote:You're wrong on this because the evidence points to a lack of QPQ, so the entire impeachment sham is predicated on the reliability of the WB as a credible witness. It’s why the left doesn’t want his credibility questioned because that is all they have.
Whistleblower doesn’t matter. It’s about evidence. The anonymous call to report the robbers entering the bank means nothing. It’s the evidence of the act that matters.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:46 am to dolamite
Is the whole Biden family immune from the law now that Dirty Joe is running for president? Quid pro quo or not, Hunter was selling influence in Ukraine. . . nothing more. That is 100% relevant to the case. We shouldn't want to support a country that DGAF about that sort of thing and there's nothing wrong with the alleged terms IMO. Fortunately, Ukraine isn't that kind of ally. And that's assuming there was some sort of QPQ which I highly doubt there was.
When this whole whistle blower testimony turns out to be another nothing burger, the libs just want to protect their puppet from prosecution for lying under oath. Very similar to the Blasey Ford testimony. 0 substance and got a little too close to the sun for someone being prosecuted for slander. That is 100% why they don't want the WB's name made public.
Trump has done NOTHING to make anyone believe he would do anything to retaliate. It's not like there is a mountain of sketchy deaths loosely associated to the Trumps like there is the Clintons. . .
When this whole whistle blower testimony turns out to be another nothing burger, the libs just want to protect their puppet from prosecution for lying under oath. Very similar to the Blasey Ford testimony. 0 substance and got a little too close to the sun for someone being prosecuted for slander. That is 100% why they don't want the WB's name made public.
Trump has done NOTHING to make anyone believe he would do anything to retaliate. It's not like there is a mountain of sketchy deaths loosely associated to the Trumps like there is the Clintons. . .
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:50 am to WPBTiger
quote:
I take that to mean there will not even be a trial, vote to dismiss/acquit right after it is sent over.
Yep.
What is stunning is whether you are relying on the "leaked" information or the actual transcripts, every supposed witness is only providing their OPINION or INTERPRETATION of what Trump did. Not one of them has said "The President told Ukraine do "X" or no aid for you."
AND EVEN IF ONE EVER DOES, this is what is done with US foreign aid ALL THE frickING TIME!!!!!!
This post was edited on 11/11/19 at 8:55 am
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:54 am to udtiger
Lest we forget Obama actually weaponized the IRS against American citizens. But, I don't see anyone on the left shedding a tear. But muh Ukraine, which actually is an absolute nothingburger.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:57 am to TBoy
quote:
The anonymous call to report the robbers entering the bank means nothing. It’s the evidence of the act that matters.
Using your scenario, there's literally no evidence of a bank robbery even having been committed.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:16 am to WPBTiger
Good luck with that nonsense.
The real questions will be answered by supreme court as wh tries to prevent testimony.
The real questions will be answered by supreme court as wh tries to prevent testimony.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:18 am to CelticDog
quote:
The real questions will be answered by supreme court as wh tries to prevent testimony.
What are you babbling about?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:22 am to Janky
Janky
Many white house employees have been invited to share their facts with the House.
Bolton?
They have declined.
Many white house employees have been invited to share their facts with the House.
Bolton?
They have declined.
This post was edited on 11/11/19 at 9:23 am
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:23 am to CelticDog
quote:
They have declined.
So?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 9:34 am to CelticDog
quote:
Janky
Many white house employees have been invited to share their facts with the House.
Bolton?
They have declined.
And?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News