- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:35 pm to Dale51
quote:
Everyone involved and were there say that didn't happen.
You just can’t be serious.
The summary of the call PROVES that it happened.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:35 pm to Tani
quote:More have already said they WOULD
If you want to treat this as any other legal case, plenty of the Republicans in the Senate would have to be excused. The Sixth Amendment secures an IMPARTIAL jury, and plenty of senators have already said that they would not vote to convict.
But, you knew that.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:36 pm to Tani
quote:False
The summary of the call PROVES that it happened.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:41 pm to PhDoogan
quote:
You do not believe the president should be entitled to the presumption of innocence in a proceeding that could literally lead to a fricking civil war and actual deaths of thousands or more?
There is no presumption of innocence in the investigation.
Threatening civil war because of a procedure that is following the law is horrific. If a gang threatened riots if a criminal were investigated for committing a crime, you’d come unglued, but you think it’s OK to threaten an actual war. Shame on you.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:43 pm to TidenUP
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:43 pm to Tani
quote:True
There is no presumption of innocence in the investigation.
quote:Meh
Threatening civil war because of a procedure that is following the law is horrific.
Running a secret partisan investigation from a body that is composed of MORE than just one party is scummy.
Moreover, they are quite obviously, investigating for the purpose of improving THEIR chances in an election.
Which, I'm told is a bad thing.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:44 pm to Tani
quote:
LINK
My God.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:47 pm to ShortyRob
The dude just tried to use the Trump "Russia, if you're listening" campaign quip.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:47 pm to DeathAndTaxes
quote:
I agree wholeheartedly with you, that nothing should be called an impeachment hearing until articles of impeachment have actually been filed.
Sorry, but that’s not correct. The articles of impeachment are voted on AFTER the hearings, which are the investigative phase. When the House votes on the articles of impeachment, if they pass, then it goes to the Senate for the trial.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:49 pm to Tani
quote:
investigative phase
Congress isn't investigating.
Democrats are
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:49 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
The dude just tried to use the Trump "Russia, if you're listening" campaign quip.
It's quite possible that we have Adam Schiff on the line here. That's his "open collusion".
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:50 pm to PhDoogan
quote:
So in this situation the President of our country either has two choices:
Utter nonsense.
There was no investigation of Hunter or Joe BIden. Joe Biden didn’t do anything that enriched his son. If someone hires his son because of the Biden name, that’s not a crime. If there had been an actual investigation, and Joe had said, “Drop it or you don’t get the money,” THAT would be a crime — but that’s not at all what happened.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:51 pm to Bass Tiger
You don’t seem to understand that doing opposition research through an American company is not a crime. Asking a foreign power to do it IS a crime.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:51 pm to davyjones
Psst
Have you guys figured out that Tani is texridder yet?
Have you guys figured out that Tani is texridder yet?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:54 pm to ShortyRob
I saw some mention earlier of Texas-themed alter. I'd prefer it to be Ridder, honestly.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:54 pm to PhDoogan
quote:
Impeachment can only be done by the House. Not a house committee created to oversee an agency of the executive created more than 200 years after the gaddam Constitution was ratified..
"There is nothing in the Constitution that requires a full House vote to launch an impeachment inquiry," Berkeley Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky told Newsweek. "That has been done before, but it is not a constitutional requirement. President Trump is wrong in saying that it is not a legitimate impeachment inquiry without a floor vote."
Do you think you know more about it than he does?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:55 pm to Tani
quote:
There was no investigation of Hunter or Joe Biden. Joe Biden didn’t do anything that enriched his son
How do you know that, if there was no investigation?
This post was edited on 10/23/19 at 12:00 am
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:56 pm to davyjones
quote:
I saw some mention earlier of Texas-themed alter. I'd prefer it to be Ridder, honestly.
it's ridder
He's already given his "tell" in this thread.
Frankly, it's pathetic.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:56 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Nope
Ooh, there’s a brilliant rebuttal. ??
Page 8 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News