- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The crying about Aranda and the D is embarrassing
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:51 pm to slackster
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:51 pm to slackster
quote:
We'll see. I'd be surprised if we go after Tua any more than normal. Keeping everything in front may be a better way to go. Alabama, much like us, lives on the big play.
Sark and Tua will destroy a predictable defense with no pressure. Do you dispute that’s what LSU is in first halves?
1
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:51 pm to slackster
quote:
The fact UF drove the field 3 times over 11 plays in the first half is an anomaly.
Bama will more than capable of doing the same thing....maybe Auburn as well if we sit on our heels.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:52 pm to El Eh Shu
quote:yep. Florida drove 75 yards for a TD their first possession of the second half. And had two other 70+ yard drives later in the second half.
This Aranda halftime adjustments lie has gotta get called out.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:52 pm to misey94
Yeah I dispute that. We pick our spots with pressure in the first half too. Sometimes it just doesn't get home.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:52 pm to slackster
Not sure I agree that this is the right tactic for our team given our offense and our defensive personnel.
We have a quick strike offense.
We have a defense that has good man to man corners and lots of speed.
We aren't good at sitting back in zone coverage. We don't have a DL that is not great at the pass rush.
The worst thing for our offense is a team that can control the clock, drive the field, and limit our offensive possessions.
IF we can't successfully drop into coverage, rush four, and get stops...then we are way better off just blitzing the crap out of people and playing man free behind it. We will give up some scoring but it will be quickly. It won't be all the time. We will get some folks behind the chains and force some punts and turnovers.
Since we can apparently score on anyone we just need some stops so we can get a lead. I don't care if we boat race everyone. its still winning.
We have a quick strike offense.
We have a defense that has good man to man corners and lots of speed.
We aren't good at sitting back in zone coverage. We don't have a DL that is not great at the pass rush.
The worst thing for our offense is a team that can control the clock, drive the field, and limit our offensive possessions.
IF we can't successfully drop into coverage, rush four, and get stops...then we are way better off just blitzing the crap out of people and playing man free behind it. We will give up some scoring but it will be quickly. It won't be all the time. We will get some folks behind the chains and force some punts and turnovers.
Since we can apparently score on anyone we just need some stops so we can get a lead. I don't care if we boat race everyone. its still winning.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:53 pm to uway
quote:
Trask was on the money on some big 3rd down throws, and also in the red zone and that made a big difference.
Being predictable against a good coach and allowing a QB to get into an easy rhythm will do that. Go re-watch the Vandy and NWST first halves. You will see bad offenses go toe-to-toe with us for the same reason.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:53 pm to slackster
quote:
Forcing a team to drive the field with 12-13 play drives is something you'll take every day of the week.
Except that you have to be able to get off the field on long 3rd downs.
Our defense has to stop missing tackles and blowing coverages. We may have the right defensive philosophy in this offensive era, like you are saying, but there is still a whole lot of improving the defense needs to do.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:53 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
So terms of the deal:
- I
Just make it ten. One out of fuve times is more than fair
-
Absolutely. Let's quantify that at 10 and we are talking about the offense as a whole, not a few games. That should be very easy to do since I "constantly did it"
-
You leftvone out
Where I said you believe Orgeron and Burrow "suck". Should be easy enough
Now go for it.
- I
quote:
provide you more than one link of you saying I'm an Orgeron hater (I'm not finding 50 damn links. I used that as a number to suggest you did it often). I can certainly find some though.
Just make it ten. One out of fuve times is more than fair
-
quote:.
I provide links to you constantly defending a bad offense last season
Absolutely. Let's quantify that at 10 and we are talking about the offense as a whole, not a few games. That should be very easy to do since I "constantly did it"
-
quote:
perma ban for me if I don't provide links. Perma ban for you if I do provide links.
You leftvone out
Where I said you believe Orgeron and Burrow "suck". Should be easy enough
Now go for it.
This post was edited on 10/13/19 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:54 pm to RedTigerRulz
quote:
Bama will more than capable of doing the same thing....maybe Auburn as well if we sit on our heels.
They're capable, but it's still unlikely for any offense to do that.
If LSU holds Alabama to 5.4 yards per play, we win easily. We have to stop the chunk plays. Every team will mess up here and there and you'll get a stop.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:55 pm to slackster
quote:
Well you don't expect it to happen a bunch. You take the approach that they're going to have to drive the field a few yards at a time if they're going to score, but you obviously hope to stop them during the drive. The fact UF drove the field 3 times over 11 plays in the first half is an anomaly.
If we continue to be predictable and get no pressure on spread QBs, this will not be an anomaly.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Where I said you believe Orgeron and Burrow "suck". Should be easy enough
Can you not read?
quote:
I just told you, you may have not used those words, but I took you saying I melted over Burrow all off-season to mean I thought he would suck. I asked you to tell me what you meant and you still refuse to do so. No link needs to be provided for this
quote:
Just make it ten. One out of fupive times is more than fair
I'll find 5. That's plenty enough to prove that you have done it multiple times.
This post was edited on 10/13/19 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:55 pm to uway
quote:
Except that you have to be able to get off the field on long 3rd downs.
Our defense has to stop missing tackles and blowing coverages. We may have the right defensive philosophy in this offensive era, like you are saying, but there is still a whole lot of improving the defense needs to do.
No doubt. There is work to do, absolutely.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:56 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
I just told you, you may have not used those words
Backing out already
So you lied, strike one.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:57 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
but I took you saying I melted over Burrow all off-season to mean I thought he would suck.
That's because you're dumb and spiteful You said the entire offense sucked donkey dicks
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:57 pm to slackster
quote:
Yeah I dispute that. We pick our spots with pressure in the first half too. Sometimes it just doesn't get home.
Then you are objectively incorrect by any reasonable measure. That’s probably why a simple stunt that resulted in a 2nd half sack seemed like water in the desert.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:57 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Backing out already
Backing out? You are the one who keeps throwing all this crap in to not accept. All I wanted was a yes or no, and you can't even do that.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:58 pm to slackster
quote:
No doubt. There is work to do, absolutely.
The problem yesterday is they effectively milked the cl Cl limiting our profile possessions and scored.
That's a defensive breakdown.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 1:59 pm to RogerTheShrubber
One more time:
1- 5 links of you referring to me as an Orgeron hater.
2- multiple links showing you defending the offense last season.
3- provided by Wednesday at 4 central.
4- I'm perma banned if I can't provide links by the time posted.
5- you perma banned if I do.
Yes or no???
1- 5 links of you referring to me as an Orgeron hater.
2- multiple links showing you defending the offense last season.
3- provided by Wednesday at 4 central.
4- I'm perma banned if I can't provide links by the time posted.
5- you perma banned if I do.
Yes or no???
Posted on 10/13/19 at 2:00 pm to tigersruledude
quote:
We aren't good at sitting back in zone coverage. We don't have a DL that is not great at the pass rush.
you're being overly kind.
We suck at zone coverage, often being out of position and our pass rush is negligible with 4 pass rushers...and here we are rushing 3 at times.
Posted on 10/13/19 at 2:00 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
Backing out? You are the one who keeps throwing all this crap in to not accept.
I haven't once.
All you have to do is prove the exact things you claimed I did or permaban.
Very simple. You're confident, do it.
Or just admit you're a drama queen and casually throw out stuff you don't mean, I'll accept either
So either thank you, or adios.
This post was edited on 10/13/19 at 2:01 pm
Page 15 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News