- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: White House blocks Ambassador to EU from testifying this morning, Schiff 9:30 presser now
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:43 am to IT_Dawg
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:43 am to IT_Dawg
Schitt for brains and Pelosi need to quit their damn grandstanding and get on with the impeachment, it’s beyond ridiculous at this point.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:44 am to IT_Dawg
Sondland's attorney:
Sondland is upset that he does not get a chance to testify today, but as a member of the State Department, must follow orders from Pompeo.
Sondland is upset that he does not get a chance to testify today, but as a member of the State Department, must follow orders from Pompeo.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:44 am to bmy
quote:
They definitely don't want him to testify given the nature of his texts that were published
Sometimes you say things that make it seem like you have literally no interest in educating yourself.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:45 am to CamdenTiger
quote:
Schiff will cry OBSTRUCTION, which was the plan all along
I wonder if anyone in the press will ask him about his blatant lies about no prior contact with the "whistleblower" or why he lied in the public record...
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:47 am to CamdenTiger
What’s being obstructed? I’m no lawyer but it’s very difficult to obstruct a nonexistent investigation.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:47 am to Janky
I’m not a legal guy but I’d assume once there is a vote and it’s a formal inquiry then these guys get full legal recourse. You could challenge the subpoena or something and have them explain motives.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:47 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
Sondland is upset that he does not get a chance to testify today, but as a member of the State Department, must follow orders from Pompeo
You see, this is key.
Schiff is going to scream and bitch and demand and subpoena and he will someday get that guy in front of him...and get his fricking legs cut off.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:48 am to IT_Dawg
Trump should hold a press conference at the exact same time.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:49 am to gthog61
quote:Not one person in the media will question it. Even though the committee has ZERO subpoena power with this issue because it is not OFFICIAL business of the House.......because they have NOT fricking voted on it.
Will anybody question schiff’s lies?
They media will fraudulently report the White House is obstructing.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:50 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
Sondland is upset that he does not get a chance to testify today, but as a member of the State Department, must follow orders from Pompeo.
Is this sort of like saying, to some couple you have absolutely no desire to socialize with... "Well, I'd really like for us to go to dinner out with y'all Friday night, but, you see, my wife has already made us other plans."?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:50 am to CamdenTiger
quote:Obstruction of what exactly?
Schiff will cry OBSTRUCTION, which was the plan all along
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:50 am to Bass Tiger
Apparently, Pompeo is pissed at how quickly this has happened and with no subpoenas from a formal inquiry.
Also, those willing to testify "voluntarily" are not sworn in, but lying has the same penalties...whatever the frick that means.
Also, those willing to testify "voluntarily" are not sworn in, but lying has the same penalties...whatever the frick that means.
This post was edited on 10/8/19 at 7:51 am
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:51 am to Oddibe
Quick question. Why is this in Schiff's committee anyway? Shouldn't it be in Nadler's committee?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:51 am to Summer of George
quote:
I’m not a legal guy but I’d assume once there is a vote and it’s a formal inquiry then these guys get full legal recourse. You could challenge the subpoena or something and have them explain motives.
Just watch, they know they don’t have schitt with the call, they are hoping to yell Obstruction to keep their idiot base on board with this Schitt investigation.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:51 am to IT_Dawg
Put them in jail until they comply.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:53 am to TBoy
quote:
Put them in jail until they comply.
Look at this bullshite
Spoken like a true fascist. Frick off
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:53 am to TBoy
quote:
TBoy
I had to give you an upvote for your sheer stupidity and effort.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:55 am to TBoy
quote:I dont think you can just jail members of Congress.
Put them in jail until they comply.
or were you suggesting we just get rid of the rule of law.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:56 am to TBoy
quote:
Put them in jail until they comply.
For which crime(s), if you’ll indulge the masses?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 7:56 am to TBoy
quote:
Put them in jail until they comply.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News