- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s becoming clear there is no whistleblower
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:53 am to roadGator
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:53 am to roadGator
Alright, if it somehow is proven that there is no actual WB, and the whole thing was coordinated without someone initiating it, then I agree that would be a major problem.
If the WB is a CIA person then that doesn’t mean we automatically discredit as a spy. But it is unsettling. Otherwise any President could just have CIA assigned to the call detail so he could discredit them as a spy.
But I have heard that there are negotiations that the WB will testify.
If the WB is a CIA person then that doesn’t mean we automatically discredit as a spy. But it is unsettling. Otherwise any President could just have CIA assigned to the call detail so he could discredit them as a spy.
But I have heard that there are negotiations that the WB will testify.
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 10:00 am
5
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:56 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
there are negotiations that the WB will testify
Yes. The air quoted Whistleblower probably also has a “fear of flying” (quotations deliberate).
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:56 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
You think they are above this after the Russian asset lie?
Come on man.
They told you.
By any means necessary.
#resist
Coordinated messaging from DNC to DNC press hit squad.
It's all there to see in plain sight.
Come on man.
They told you.
By any means necessary.
#resist
Coordinated messaging from DNC to DNC press hit squad.
It's all there to see in plain sight.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:01 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
And even if the “whistleblower” testified that doesn’t mean it isn’t an actor playing a role
No more far fetched than the rest of this horse shite
No more far fetched than the rest of this horse shite
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:46 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Alright, if it somehow is proven that there is no actual WB, and the whole thing was coordinated without someone initiating it, then I agree that would be yet another coup attempt.
Fixed. YW.
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 10:48 am
Posted on 10/1/19 at 1:24 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
if it somehow is proven that there is no actual WB, and the whole thing was coordinated without someone initiating it, then I agree that would be a major problem.
How is it not already proven? The "whistleblower" claims were 100% hearsay. Not first hand knowledge. This is FACT.
quote:
If the WB is a CIA person then that doesn’t mean we automatically discredit as a spy.
Um, listening in on the President of the United States' phone calls to foreign dignitaries and then leaking them to the press and the Democrats IS SPYING.
quote:
Otherwise any President could just have CIA assigned to the call detail so he could discredit them as a spy.
What the whistleblower did was spy. Actually, it was repeating information that was gathered via the act of spying.
quote:
But I have heard that there are negotiations that the WB will testify.
I guarantee you this will never happen.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News