- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Didi going in dry
Posted on 9/22/19 at 3:00 pm to GOP_Tiger
Posted on 9/22/19 at 3:00 pm to GOP_Tiger
if garland becomes a much better player than Hayes or culver it’s still part of the opportunity cost of the trade regardless of whether the pels would have taken him or not. The fact remains that they could have taken him and didn’t
It’s not like he was a late round pick
It’s not like he was a late round pick
1
Posted on 9/22/19 at 4:30 pm to cgrand
quote:
if garland becomes a much better player than Hayes or culver it’s still part of the opportunity cost of the trade regardless of whether the pels would have taken him or no
That's one way to view it. I would view it as a talent evaluation mistake that, since it would've happened whether we made the trade or not, isn't connected to the trade. It's not an opportunity cost if you wouldn't take the opportunity.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News