Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

California man exonerated in stabbing death after 28 years in prison

Posted on 8/28/19 at 2:43 pm
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20802 posts
Posted on 8/28/19 at 2:43 pm
TL/DR: Man sentenced 28 years for stabbing child molester. Actual killer confesses after sentencing and is jailed for the crime. Man stays in jail bc that is "post-conviction evidence"

quote:

A California man convicted in the stabbing death of a man suspected of sexually molesting a child has been exonerated after 28 years in prison thanks to newly discovered evidence, including the confession of the true killer, a lawyer said. The conviction of Bob Fenenbock was reversed Friday by a judge in Solano County Superior Court in the case handled by the Santa Clara-based Northern California Innocence Project.

Fenenbock, who owned a mining claim and operated a wood-cutting business, was the first of several people to be tried in the 1991 killing of Gary Summar, who was beaten and stabbed to death at a campground in Trinity County. Fenenbock was convicted on the testimony of a 9-year-old boy who defense lawyers said had been coached by a therapist and convinced by detectives that Fenenbock was part of a mob that conspired to kill Summar. Shortly after the conviction, Bernard MacCarlie acknowledged killing Summar alone to avenge the molestation of his girlfriend's daughter, lawyers for the Innocence Project said. MacCarlie explained that he had been molested as a child and snapped when he heard that Summar had molested the young child living with them, the lawyers said. MacCarlie was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. Fenenbock, however, remained in prison because MacCarlie's confession was considered "post-conviction evidence," which, at the time, had to point "unerringly" to innocence to be considered. The California Supreme Court found MacCarlie's confession insufficient by that standard. In 2017, Fenenbock learned about a California law supported that allows newly discovered evidence to be presented if it "more likely than not" would have changed the outcome of a trial. Fenenbock reached out to the Northern California Innocence Project, which accepted his case last year.

"It took nearly three decades, a team of lawyers, an amazing investigator, a new law, and a great judge to set Bob free, even though all they had against him was a kid who had been asked to make up a story that was completely contradicted by the physical evidence," said Paige Kaneb, lead attorney on the case. "This case shows how easily a wrongful conviction can happen, and how hard it is to fix one," she added. Prosecutors have 60 days to decide to retry Fenenbock or appeal the court's decision.


MSN
This post was edited on 8/28/19 at 2:46 pm
Posted by sand mountainDvalues
Member since Oct 2018
8718 posts
Posted on 8/28/19 at 2:45 pm to
Roflmao a fricking 9 year old got this guy locked up for 30 years
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20802 posts
Posted on 8/28/19 at 2:46 pm to
Not only that, but when the actual killer confessed he stayed locked up because of the 9 y/o's testimony.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
104406 posts
Posted on 8/28/19 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Fenenbock, who owned a mining claim


LINK
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11998 posts
Posted on 8/28/19 at 2:49 pm to
What the frick? He's convicted then another person comes forward to admit to it and serves time for the crime without releasing the innocent first guy? He should sue and get paid major bucks.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25848 posts
Posted on 8/28/19 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

all they had against him was a kid who had been asked to make up a story that was completely contradicted by the physical evidence


People put far too much stock into eye-witness accounts.
Posted by Shiftyplus1
Regret nothing that made you smile
Member since Oct 2005
14279 posts
Posted on 8/28/19 at 2:53 pm to
The word of a nine year old should never, EVER be the linchpin of a prosecutor's case. fricking ridiculous. I hope that man sues them for half the state and wins.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 8/28/19 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

People put far too much stock into eye-witness accounts.


This can never be said enough...and yet we seem to think it's the most important thing. How often do you hear people say, "I know what I saw!!!"

Yeah...it's shite evidence.
Posted by TN A A Ron
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2019
78 posts
Posted on 8/28/19 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Fenenbock, who owned a mining claim and operated a wood-cutting business


Somebody's about to get paid... although I am sure the settlement won't come close to compensating for being locked up most for that long.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21697 posts
Posted on 8/28/19 at 3:00 pm to
Just another reminder that most DA's will let their convicts rot rather than admit they were wrong... and people wonder why I am against the death penalty.
Posted by LSUJuice
Back in Houston
Member since Apr 2004
18016 posts
Posted on 8/28/19 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Fenenbock, however, remained in prison because MacCarlie's confession was considered "post-conviction evidence," which, at the time, had to point "unerringly" to innocence to be considered. The California Supreme Court found MacCarlie's confession insufficient by that standard

You'd think that somehow this violates the 5th or 14th amendments. I mean, the state had two guys locked up for the same crime.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram