Started By
Message

re: US District Court in NOLA has stayed a bunch of civil cases where fraud has been alleged.

Posted on 8/22/19 at 7:14 am to
Posted by rumproast
Member since Dec 2003
12102 posts
Posted on 8/22/19 at 7:14 am to
My god...many on here have taken the insurance company drivel hook line and sinker. Insurance companies aren't reducing your rates...and they aren't looking out for your best interest. They want your money, and want to pay as little as they can. All of these supposed ideas...you know...to get those greedy lawyers...result in less for real victims and more fore the insurance company. Like med mal caps...500k since 1974. You think 500k compensates an infant rendered quadriplegic by a doctor on his cell phone? No...Vitter wanted it reduced to 250k....because those poor doctors have high insurance rates (while making 800k a year.) Seriously...when these proposals come out..and they point at the legal system...ask yourself "who profits?" It isn't you...its the insurance company. Every single time. Then ask...who is pushing the reform and who is backing them? You guessed it...insurance companies.
Posted by arseinclarse
Member since Apr 2007
34528 posts
Posted on 8/22/19 at 7:19 am to
No one has bought in yet to the claims. But when federal court puts those orders in play, something looks suspect. Why are you so defensive?

Which firm do you work for?
This post was edited on 8/22/19 at 7:21 am
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85481 posts
Posted on 8/22/19 at 7:22 am to
quote:

Then ask...who is pushing the reform and who is backing them? You guessed it...insurance companies.


We know this. We're not stupid.

We still would rather side with insurance companies than PI attorneys.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22214 posts
Posted on 8/22/19 at 8:25 am to
quote:

All of these supposed ideas...you know...to get those greedy lawyers...result in less for real victims and more fore the insurance company. Like med mal caps...500k since 1974. You think 500k compensates an infant rendered quadriplegic by a doctor on his cell phone? No...Vitter wanted it reduced to 250k....because those poor doctors have high insurance rates (while making 800k a year.) Seriously...when these proposals come out..and they point at the legal system...ask yourself "who profits?" It isn't you...its the insurance company. Every single time. Then ask...who is pushing the reform and who is backing them? You guessed it...insurance companies.



Completely frivolous lawsuits have as much or more to do with these caps as the insurance companies. If there were no med mal cap doctors would get hit with malpractice suits daily by people looking for a lottery ticket.

And insurance companies aren’t the only one benefiting from this. If there was no med mal cap then med mal insurance premiums would skyrocket. Who do you think that cost would be passed on to?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram