- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: US District Court in NOLA has stayed a bunch of civil cases where fraud has been alleged.
Posted on 8/22/19 at 7:14 am to Slippy
Posted on 8/22/19 at 7:14 am to Slippy
My god...many on here have taken the insurance company drivel hook line and sinker. Insurance companies aren't reducing your rates...and they aren't looking out for your best interest. They want your money, and want to pay as little as they can. All of these supposed ideas...you know...to get those greedy lawyers...result in less for real victims and more fore the insurance company. Like med mal caps...500k since 1974. You think 500k compensates an infant rendered quadriplegic by a doctor on his cell phone? No...Vitter wanted it reduced to 250k....because those poor doctors have high insurance rates (while making 800k a year.) Seriously...when these proposals come out..and they point at the legal system...ask yourself "who profits?" It isn't you...its the insurance company. Every single time. Then ask...who is pushing the reform and who is backing them? You guessed it...insurance companies.
Posted on 8/22/19 at 7:19 am to rumproast
No one has bought in yet to the claims. But when federal court puts those orders in play, something looks suspect. Why are you so defensive?
Which firm do you work for?
Which firm do you work for?
This post was edited on 8/22/19 at 7:21 am
Posted on 8/22/19 at 7:22 am to rumproast
quote:
Then ask...who is pushing the reform and who is backing them? You guessed it...insurance companies.
We know this. We're not stupid.
We still would rather side with insurance companies than PI attorneys.
Posted on 8/22/19 at 8:25 am to rumproast
quote:
All of these supposed ideas...you know...to get those greedy lawyers...result in less for real victims and more fore the insurance company. Like med mal caps...500k since 1974. You think 500k compensates an infant rendered quadriplegic by a doctor on his cell phone? No...Vitter wanted it reduced to 250k....because those poor doctors have high insurance rates (while making 800k a year.) Seriously...when these proposals come out..and they point at the legal system...ask yourself "who profits?" It isn't you...its the insurance company. Every single time. Then ask...who is pushing the reform and who is backing them? You guessed it...insurance companies.
Completely frivolous lawsuits have as much or more to do with these caps as the insurance companies. If there were no med mal cap doctors would get hit with malpractice suits daily by people looking for a lottery ticket.
And insurance companies aren’t the only one benefiting from this. If there was no med mal cap then med mal insurance premiums would skyrocket. Who do you think that cost would be passed on to?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News