- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jonah Hill Bomb: "watch out for pels to get 8, 10 from hawks"
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:17 am to Tigercowboy
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:17 am to Tigercowboy
quote:
I don't think its a bad deal with them taking on solo. In this draft I think 4-10 is very hit or miss. Having two picks in that range gives us a better shot of hitting.
That's how i feel too.
No one can feel confident, even scouts who do this for a living, that one guy is a sure thing at #4.
Give me #8 and #10, espcially if it means it get Hayes.
Turner is nice, but #10 could be..........a Turner! (said in Peter Griffins voice)
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:19 am to TeddyPadillac
I not only really like turner but he has a great contract. That’s how you build a team. Just seems to make too much sense to me.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:19 am to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
If Solo is involved then I doubt we include pick 4 too
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconconfused.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconconfused.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconconfused.gif)
Wait, so we give them Solo.....and they give us 8 & 10...???
Well, sign me up
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:19 am to TeddyPadillac
wish ATL could turn 8 and 17 for #6 or #7.
Then we get 6/7 and 10 for 4
Then we get 6/7 and 10 for 4
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:21 am to Chad504boy
That's an overpay. Solo is a trade asset.
As it is, while 1-3 are set, 4-7 or so are also pretty set. That gets us on the very edge of the next tier. Pass.
As it is, while 1-3 are set, 4-7 or so are also pretty set. That gets us on the very edge of the next tier. Pass.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:21 am to TeddyPadillac
Goga at 10 seems to fit Langdon too well
In fact that's where tankathon just mocked him
For some reason Hayes went to CHI at 7 and Hunter dropped yo 8
In fact that's where tankathon just mocked him
For some reason Hayes went to CHI at 7 and Hunter dropped yo 8
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:22 am to LosLobos111
Hunter and Hayes would be a massive win along with shedding solo if it worked out like that.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:23 am to CP3forMVP
quote:
8 and 10 is more appealing to me than the other deals I've heard rumored,
quote:
The offers I've heard for 4 sucks, 8 or 10 would be awful.
This feels contradictory.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:24 am to MrJimBeam
If you wanted to make the trade and could do #4 for #8 & #10 without Solo, why would you include him?
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:24 am to Mystictiger
quote:
Cap space for free agency
This
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:26 am to MrJimBeam
quote:
Hunter and Hayes would be a massive win
He just wants to make us feel wanted.
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81IVm37bCYL._SY355_.jpg)
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:26 am to burdman
Only reason is if Griffin thinks we can contend this year but yeah you’re right. Expiring is worth something at trade deadline to teams.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:26 am to LosLobos111
If you dont draft Garland, where is the shooting going to come from?
We will be rolling out a starting lineup of:
Ball/Holiday/Ingram/Zion/Okafor as it currently stands, which has literally no shooting. I would expect Garland to move into that starting rotation over ball by playoff time at a minimum. I know we have shooters on the bench, but I'm curious to see how the starting lineup plays out if we dont go with a guy like garland. That starting lineup is a bit concerning to me as it currently stands.
We will be rolling out a starting lineup of:
Ball/Holiday/Ingram/Zion/Okafor as it currently stands, which has literally no shooting. I would expect Garland to move into that starting rotation over ball by playoff time at a minimum. I know we have shooters on the bench, but I'm curious to see how the starting lineup plays out if we dont go with a guy like garland. That starting lineup is a bit concerning to me as it currently stands.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:26 am to MrJimBeam
In reality, you’re getting Reddish and Hayes.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:27 am to That's BS
Amazing how king Joffrey can rule an empire and then reincarnate into a country singer.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:29 am to St Augustine
Solo’s contract is only valuable if we are willing to eat a bad contract. I’m assuming that’s not the route they are looking to go, so that’s why getting rid of him or letting him expire is best
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:30 am to Chad504boy
I don't get doing that at all.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:30 am to Chad504boy
The 8 pick is the pick of death. Try to find the last great 8th pick in the NBA.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:31 am to Anaximander
quote:
The 8 pick is the pick of death. Try to find the last great 8th pick in the NBA.
omg we got to go all the way back to willis reed
![](https://rs201.pbsrc.com/albums/aa36/Kenjiak/icons/bwahaha.gif?w=280&h=210&fit=crop)
![](https://rs201.pbsrc.com/albums/aa36/Kenjiak/icons/bwahaha.gif?w=280&h=210&fit=crop)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)