- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jonah Hill Bomb: "watch out for pels to get 8, 10 from hawks"
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:32 am to Mystictiger
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:32 am to Mystictiger
Why would the Pels need cap space for free agency now? This isn't the time to load up on free agents.
1
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:33 am to Puddinhead
quote:
This feels contradictory.
I'm talking in terms of I would feel better about 8&10 than any other trade, but Griffin would try to move the picks for veterans that aren't all that desirable.
I want to keep #4, but if a trade is made I would prefer to keep #8 and #10 than move those for something else.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:34 am to Anaximander
Sexton looked pretty good
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:35 am to Overbrook
Cap space doesn't only have to be used on FAs
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:36 am to King Zion
quote:
If you dont draft Garland, where is the shooting going to come from?
were you expecting to rely on a rookie for your 3 point shooting this year?
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:37 am to Anaximander
quote:
The 8 pick is the pick of death. Try to find the last great 8th pick in the NBA.
yeah I know. But the 9th pick as been fire
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:38 am to Chad504boy
quote:
wish ATL could turn 8 and 17 for #6 or #7.
Then we get 6/7 and 10 for 4
I mean if they did that, why not just offer us 8,10,17?
Also, I have no fricking godly idea why people are acting like Solomon Hill is a positive asset. He's a neutral asset AT BEST and even arguing that is still a difficult position.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:39 am to ShamelessPel
Cause if they complete prior then it’s easier for us to work in Lakers deal I would imagine
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:40 am to LosLobos111
It's no time to load up on veterans either.
Build a championship team; building a quick 7 seed lessens the chances of building a champion.
Build a championship team; building a quick 7 seed lessens the chances of building a champion.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:41 am to LosLobos111
#4 and Solo for 8 and 10
Sign me up
Take Doumbouya at 8, and package 10 with Moore for a good young sniper, like a Van Vleet type (I know we cant get Van Vleet, just using him as a type of guy to target)
Sign me up
Take Doumbouya at 8, and package 10 with Moore for a good young sniper, like a Van Vleet type (I know we cant get Van Vleet, just using him as a type of guy to target)
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:50 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Cause if they complete prior then it’s easier for us to work in Lakers deal I would imagine
Sorry, I should have phrased better. Those 3 picks hadn't been offered to our knowledge, so it seems unrealistic to expect them.
I agree with your premise though chad.
For all the talk of the "3.5 (still think the Garland talk is a little manufactured) person draft"...I still very much dislike the looks of the prospects past 7 once Hunter/Culver/Garland/White are off the board. If there was one more player I could add to that grouping, I'd be glad to move down to 8/10 for 4, but I just don't see it...maybe Rui Hachimura could excite me, but the whole lot behind those 7 seems like a bunch of crap shoots.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 9:51 am to TeddyPadillac
quote:
were you expecting to rely on a rookie for your 3 point shooting this year?
Uh no... I never said that. He does however give you a long term solution for the lack of shooting in the starting lineup. That's why I asked the question of what is the plan to address the shooting in the starting lineup if we dont draft someone like Garland.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 10:09 am to Chad504boy
I’d rather keep Solo, do 8&10 if we going that way which I rather not. But if we do I want unprotected swap rights for next year included. They will be in the lotto next year and with these new odds, you never know...
Posted on 6/20/19 at 10:11 am to Soggymoss
Would anyone want to take Tyler Herro at the #8 or #10 pick? You can get a sharpshooter at a good price to compliment Jrue and Zion
Posted on 6/20/19 at 10:12 am to LigerFan
Hayes and Herro. I wouldn't complain much
Posted on 6/20/19 at 10:43 am to ShamelessPel
I like Hachimura also if we drop down.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 1:16 pm to Overbrook
quote:
Solo is a trade asset.
not with that contract, nor is he really any good...
Posted on 6/20/19 at 1:18 pm to chRxis
He is an asset. Expiring contracts are an asset.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 1:36 pm to burdman
quote:
Expiring contracts are an asset.
yeah, I get that, but usually you at least want the guy to be able to produce SOMETHING while his contract is expiring...
Hill is just... well, I don't know how he's even still in the NBA, being honest... he doesn't do anything well, he's not overly athletic, he doesn't seem to have a high basketball IQ...
Posted on 6/20/19 at 2:32 pm to burdman
quote:He and his contract are not nearly as valuable as some are making it out to be.
He is an asset. Expiring contracts are an asset.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News