Started By
Message

re: Why can’t BR have a San Antonio type Riverwalk area?

Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:09 am to
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
38887 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Have you see Ward's Creek after a heavy rain? LOL


The SA Riverwalk was originally built as part of a flood control project.

quote:

Hugman's plan was initially not well-received – the area was noted for being dangerous. At one point, it was declared off-limits to military personnel. People were warned of the threat of being "drowned like a rat" should the river flood. However, over the next decade support for commercial development of the river bend grew, and crucial funding came in 1939 under the Works Progress Administration (WPA) which resulted in the initial construction of a network of some 17,000 feet (5,200 m) of walkways, about twenty bridges, and extensive plantings including some of the bald cypress (others are several hundred years old) whose branches stretch up to ten stories and are visible from street level.
This post was edited on 6/18/19 at 11:12 am
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
14454 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:32 am to
It also helped that there were already extant businesses like hotels and restaurants built along the river. All they needed to do was create new entrances to their buildings on the back/river side, along with seating areas.
Posted by tommy2tone1999
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6840 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:56 pm to
Baton Rouge cannot correct the flooding problems it currently has, much less using one of the established waterways it already uses to receive runoff. Terrible idea.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram