- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: At least 6 college basketball programs will be notified of major NCAA violations by Summer
Posted on 6/12/19 at 8:00 pm to ellessuuuu
Posted on 6/12/19 at 8:00 pm to ellessuuuu
quote:
Why would bringing up Will Wade's name be sufficient to justify a notice of allegations
If that was all that happened over the last calendar year, I wouldn’t be worried. But as someone that followed this investigation harder than most, I am legitimately concerned for the future of Will Wade. I thought 2-3 schools would feel the brunt of this, with LSU being on the fringe. But SIX??? They are almost assuredly one of the six, or in that next wave.
You can blabble on about what the media has reported, but surely you understand that there has likely been information shared & collected that has not been printed.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 8:07 pm to Lester Earl
I don't think so, Wade would not have been reinstated if the NCAA didn't give LSU a green light.
Just play the damn tapes,baby!
Just play the damn tapes,baby!
Posted on 6/12/19 at 8:13 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
You can blabble on about what the media has reported, but surely you understand that there has likely been information shared & collected that has not been printed.
You’re an idiot. Someone directly associated with the NCAA explicitly contradicted exactly what you just said. But, I’m sure you know more than Mr Wilcox. Right?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 8:50 pm to Lester Earl
Please tell me what evidence the NCAA has that Wade did anything wrong? The only admissible evidence was the statement by Richardson regarding Naz.
The article in the OP includes quotes from the NCAA admitting they can't use wiretaps not used at trial as actual evidence in it's investigation, but is limited to using that information as points of discussion with the particular coach. So we are back to square, where is the evidence you are so concerned about?
In the word of Lt. Kaffey in A Few Good Men, "it doesn't what I believe. It only matter what I can prove."
The article in the OP includes quotes from the NCAA admitting they can't use wiretaps not used at trial as actual evidence in it's investigation, but is limited to using that information as points of discussion with the particular coach. So we are back to square, where is the evidence you are so concerned about?
In the word of Lt. Kaffey in A Few Good Men, "it doesn't what I believe. It only matter what I can prove."
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 8:57 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)