re: NO COLLUSION and NO OBSTRUCTION!

quote:

---

and a sitting president cannot be indicted.

---

Where in Mueller's report did he say that is why he didn't decide to indict on obstruction???

AG Barr specifically ASKED Mueller "did this have ANY influence on your decision to not indict on Obstruction?' = and Mueller said NO. The conclusion was there was NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE to substantiate an incitement for obstruction under ANY circumstance - the PRIMARY fact being there was NO CORRUPT INTENT.

If you disagree with that you are a moron.

quote:

---

Mueller says there is substantial evidence of the intent

---

Whee exactly is that word found found in the report? I have not read it - but I do not recall anyone quoting from the report itself that Mueller described it as "substantial"

I recall that he said there were 'avenues' that he investigated that "could be considered" as obstruction - but he found NO EVIDENCE that any ACTIONs were taken by Trump.

SUBSTANTIAL is a word used by Shiff and Nadler and the rest of the DEMOCRAT retards.

I may be wrong - please correct me if I am because you seem to have pored thru the report more than I have. I am only interested in the FINAL CONCLUSION.

But I do hate to be wrong - please correct me - and I will give you praise - and promise to read more of your posts for the next 3 months.