- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another math thread: "In dog beers I've only had one" doesn't make sense
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:01 pm to ReauxlTide222
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:01 pm to ReauxlTide222
I mean it became obvious they are trolling at this point but the wiki link describes the term “dog years” exactly how it’s always been used/applied. The correct way...
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:05 pm to YipSkiddlyDooo
quote:
wiki link
I just edited to be the correct way. Now what?
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:32 pm to YipSkiddlyDooo
Let me break it down for you dog years all the time, I can define phrases however I want types.
The purpose of "animal years" is to compare the relative lifespans of two animals. Agreed? You kind of have to.
Ok, so you're comparing a dog's life to a human's. You say your 7 year old dog is 49 dog years old, and you say your 49 year old arse is 7 dog years old. Dog years both ways, you do what you want.
Ok, now compare a dog's life to a cat's life. Still going with dog years both ways? Ok, they live about the same, so the 7 year old dog is 7 dog years old, and the 7 year old cat is 7 dog years old. You do what you want.
Now take the dog out, and let's compare a cat's life with a squirrel. Which animal do you choose to go both ways with? You have no logical way to answer this question, because you have insisted on defining "dog years" incorrectly.
The only way this whole exercise makes sense is to define "dog years" correctly and logically. Animal X is animal Y years old, and animal Y is animal X years old. A 7 year old dog is 49 human years old, and a 49 year old human is 7 dog years old.
The purpose of "animal years" is to compare the relative lifespans of two animals. Agreed? You kind of have to.
Ok, so you're comparing a dog's life to a human's. You say your 7 year old dog is 49 dog years old, and you say your 49 year old arse is 7 dog years old. Dog years both ways, you do what you want.
Ok, now compare a dog's life to a cat's life. Still going with dog years both ways? Ok, they live about the same, so the 7 year old dog is 7 dog years old, and the 7 year old cat is 7 dog years old. You do what you want.
Now take the dog out, and let's compare a cat's life with a squirrel. Which animal do you choose to go both ways with? You have no logical way to answer this question, because you have insisted on defining "dog years" incorrectly.
The only way this whole exercise makes sense is to define "dog years" correctly and logically. Animal X is animal Y years old, and animal Y is animal X years old. A 7 year old dog is 49 human years old, and a 49 year old human is 7 dog years old.
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:33 pm to YipSkiddlyDooo
quote:
I mean it became obvious they are trolling at this point but the wiki link describes the term “dog years” exactly how it’s always been used/applied. The correct way...
Both links described it it both ways.
Only one way makes logical sense. I'll continue to roll with the one that actually makes sense when you put a modicum of intelligent thought into it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News