- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the goal of the NYT spy story??
Posted on 5/3/19 at 9:14 am to YankeeBama
Posted on 5/3/19 at 9:14 am to YankeeBama
Now this is INTERESTING
Judge Rosemary Collyer signed the initial FISA Application on October 21, 2016.
Collyer was informed of FISA Abuse on October 24, 2016 by Dir Rogers.
Collyer is the same Judge who authored the damning April 26, 2017 unsealed FISA Court Ruling.
Judge Rosemary Collyer signed the initial FISA Application on October 21, 2016.
Collyer was informed of FISA Abuse on October 24, 2016 by Dir Rogers.
Collyer is the same Judge who authored the damning April 26, 2017 unsealed FISA Court Ruling.
0
Posted on 5/3/19 at 9:34 am to WorkinDawg
That story definitely wasn’t written entirely by a NYT reporter.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 9:57 am to CoachChappy
quote:
They “scooped” everyone.
2 scoops?
Posted on 5/3/19 at 10:01 am to Bunyan
quote:
Crossfire Hurricane "officially" started on July 31, 2016
The initial FISA warrant was obtained/signed on October 21, 2016
Thanks for the clarification.
Wow...that is a major problem. Spying on American citizens without a warrant.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 10:02 am to WorkinDawg
quote:
I know they have a motive....just not sure what it is
Simple
They're setting up the "yeah we did it, but it's all fricking good because Orange Man Bad" argument.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 10:03 am to WorkinDawg
Get ahead of the IG report and control the narrative.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 10:04 am to Scruffy
quote:This is why their ENTIRE focus is ONLY on the justifying doing it.
The issue is, if that is their play, they will need to justify continuing the investigation after they determined it to be false, which I don’t think they can do.
They want to completely avoid the subject of the fact that they did it.......and found jack shite..........and THEN, CONTINUED saying he was a Russian asset and impaneled a SC to go after him for it.............for something they ALREADY KNEW was false.
And NOW? Now they want to cry obstruction of an investigation they ALREADY KNEW shouldn't have occurred in the first place
Posted on 5/3/19 at 10:21 am to ShortyRob
quote:
They're setting up the "yeah we did it, but it's all fricking good because Orange Man Bad" argument.
Even if Orange Man Bad how do they get around spying on Trump associates without a warrant?
LEO doesn't do that to the most hardened criminals.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 10:30 am to cajunangelle
quote:
What is the goal of the NYT spy story??
quote:
get out in front of what is coming out; and say they thought the Russians infiltrated so they were black jesus heroes acting on national security purposes.
Yep, they are going to admit to the spying (only because they can't deny it anymore), but the spying was justified because they had good intelligence that Russia is a big meanie poopy face.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 11:07 am to Langland
THIS!!!!
It was OK because we thought the russians.
It was OK because we thought the russians.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 11:14 am to WorkinDawg
They’re also conveniently removing their paywall this weekend:
Email I got this morning.
quote:
As leaders abroad and around the world continue to shun the press, we invite Times readers to join us in acknowledging everyone’s need and right to a free and open press.
Email I got this morning.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 12:02 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Even if Orange Man Bad how do they get around spying on Trump associates without a warrant?
The first thing you have to accept is that NO ONE you debate on the left in relation to this subject actually CARES if it was technically legal or not. They also don't care at all if it was ethical. Hell, they don't even actually support doing it in principle.
They simply support doing it to their opponents
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News