Started By
Message
locked post

Hugo Chavez and Nelson Mandela - international heroes of the 20th century

Posted on 3/16/19 at 6:40 pm
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
21864 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 6:40 pm
I remember first learning of them in 3rd grade in 2000- our class's World History textbook had a "contemporary era" section and characterized both as maven stalwarts of positive transformity, divine prophets to be admired.

They have always been Marxist agitators with organizational competence; the fruits of their labors- death, starvation, anarchy-are just beginning to bloom after a couple of decades and the yield is as was always expected.


I pondered whether textbooks might be updated to inform students of this development, but then I realized the sad truth that the programming might be irreversible- many generations of mentally ill Leftists will die believing it to be a matter of history that these two men - the cultural revolutions they spearheaded - are admirable, wise, heroes of progress.

Hugo Chavez and Nelson Mandela have been disassociated from contemporary disasters in South Africa and Venezuala.

Do either of them get blame for the unrest they primed their people for?
This post was edited on 3/16/19 at 7:01 pm
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 6:44 pm to
quote:


I remember first learning of them in 3rd grade in 2000- our class's World History textbook had a "contemporary era" section and characterized both as admirables heroes to be admired




This is what 3rd graders do:
This post was edited on 3/16/19 at 6:48 pm
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
19121 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

Hugo Chavez and Nelson Mandela have been disassociated from contemporary disasters in South Africa and Venezuala.



Chavez was just a ruthless dictator. There was nothing remarkable about his rule. The one difference was that Venezuela had oil to fund his country.

Mandela was a live martyr and his release from prison was due to international pressure and it brought about the end of Apartheid in RSA. He will always be remembered for that. Apartheid was not slavery but it was forced racial division and extremely oppressive to the Black Africans. Whatever RSA or Mandela did after that was regardless of the end of Apartheid...
This post was edited on 3/16/19 at 7:22 pm
Posted by eng08
Member since Jan 2013
5997 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 7:22 pm to
Mandela joined whatever group could get his movement progressed. If it meant being a communist one year and a capitalist the next he did it.

Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54753 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

I remember first learning of them in 3rd grade in 2000- our class's World History textbook had a "contemporary era" section and characterized both as maven stalwarts of positive transformity, divine prophets to be admired.


Things that didn’t happen for $1,000, Alex.

This post was edited on 3/16/19 at 10:59 pm
Posted by OldmanBeasley
Charlotte
Member since Jun 2014
9722 posts
Posted on 3/16/19 at 10:59 pm to
Bull shite you don’t even learn to read until like 5th grade
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89622 posts
Posted on 3/17/19 at 12:35 am to
quote:

Do either of them get blame for the unrest they primed their people for?



The problem is the left canonizes those folks, particularly Mandela. No one on that side is going to weep when the genocide is complete in SA. When a country that not so long ago exported food is starving in the near future, they will blame whitey.

Rinse repeat.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram