quote:
LSU then changed the meeting and rescheduled it so that the NCAA could be present. LSU also said Wade wouldn’t be allowed to have his lawyers at the meeting.

quote:
Wade had and still has every intention of meeting with his bosses they’re the ones holding this up by insisting that the NCAA be present.

This was LSU's meeting. LSU (the employer) decides when, where, and who is invited to ANY meeting they REQUIRE an employee to attend. What part of WW = employee and LSU = employer do you not understand? WW cannot dictate (to his employer) ANY of these parameters.

quote:
Wade cannot give the NCAA any information about this case without altering the case and possibly damaging it beyond repair

WW can speak to anyone about anything. There is no legal mandate about this that pertains to WW. WW and his lawyer are attempting some "slight of hand" by conflating his potential appearance as a witness for the defense and answering questions about his contract with his employer (and the NCAA). WW has no legal issues with the FBI/this federal court case. If he did, he would be a defendant. What WW is (allegedly) on tape saying is not illegal. It is potentially in violation of his LSU contract and NCAA rules (neither of which you go to jail for). WW's refusal to meet with LSU & the NCAA (as he is required to do by contract, that he signed) makes him look guilty of something quite bad. If WW is innocent, meet with your employer and say that (would have no effect on a federal court case). If WW did something wrong, meet with your employer and explain (would have no effect on a federal court case). What is WW afraid of? Is he worried that his comments to LSU/NCAA will make someone in a federal court case look more or less guilty of something? If WW has information about the guilt or innocence of someone, he should be willing to share that with the FBI, police, etc. What is WW (and his lawyer) afraid of? Could it be that WW was hoping to slide his meeting with LSU/NCAA until after the tournament and if he performed well (possibly Final Four or better) he could use that as ammunition (public opinion) to help save his job? i.e. "Yea, I know I made some big mistakes but you really can't fire me because I took our team to the final four."
Just a thought...because much of this junk between WW and LSU simply does not make sense.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by NC_Tigah

Carolinas

Member since Sep 2003

124424 posts

Posted on 3/28/19 at 6:54 am to Irish LSU Fan

quote:
WW can speak to anyone about anything.

Again?
You are going there again?
Seriously?

So ONCE AGAIN, Will Wade could "speak to anyone about anything." It would be stupid to expose himself legally in that way. But he could do it. He could also climb to the top of Memorial Tower and jump, just to see how the landing would feel.

quote:
WW has no legal issues with the FBI/this federal court case.

We have discussed the concept of a perjury trap extensively. At this point, it is apparent you are either learning impaired, or just don't care about facts.

quote:
Wade put out a statement Friday essentially saying that when all the facts come out the story will look a lot different than it does now. Beyond that he’s not going to say any more until he testifies at that trial, and nobody really ought to ask him to – if Wade were to go into a room with Alleva, LSU president F. King Alexander and/or members of the university’s Board of Supervisors and discuss anything on those transcripts it’s a good bet he’ll subject all of them to being subpoenaed by Dawkins’ defense counsel as well, and at that point everybody could be in a perjury trap. Be careful what you ask for.
LINK

========

quote:
Is he worried that his comments to LSU/NCAA will make someone in a federal court case look more or less guilty of something?

Since you are either incapable of understanding how a perjury trap can render an innocent man guilty, or ignore the fact because it does not fit your narrative, let's talk about this in different terms.

Wade is threatened with subpoena by an adversarial (that means unfriendly) counsel.
With me so far?
The effort of that counsel will be to imply Wade did things including things he may not have done. He does not have Wade's interest at heart. If Wade telegraphed his testimonial responses for that unfriendly counsel, it would be akin to one football team giving the other its gameplan and playsheets weeks in advance of the game.
Got it?

Even if the obvious threat of legal entrapment is beyond you, perhaps you can understand the football analogy?

quote:
What is WW (and his lawyer) afraid of?

It is a question which has been answered for you many, many, many, many times.

Wade has not been dismissed. Why?
Perhaps you should ask what is LSU afraid of?

Smart, whose case is joined at the hip to Wade, is reinstated.
Perhaps you should ask why would LSU and the NCAA do that?

This post was edited on 3/28/19 at 7:26 am

1 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board