- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Basketball Only
Posted on 2/4/19 at 11:14 am to Crewz
Posted on 2/4/19 at 11:14 am to Crewz
quote:
I agree. I'd go lower usage guys who can impact the game without taking or making shots. My fear is that this team acquires too much talent that impact the game most by scoring
So if you play more lower guys who don't take shots then you easily frame out who's going to always be going for the points in your scheme.
In just a game theory sense, I don't like that. They can improve the efficiency of the team by teaching players to assess their situations better aka Rondo-esq film study as a team.
1
Posted on 2/4/19 at 11:18 am to hometownhero89
I don't believe you can re-train high usage guys to be lower usage guys unless you are winning at a massive clip.
If you aren't winning 60-70% of your games, guys will start to look out for themselves and their numbers if they think that scoring will get them their next big paycheck.
The Pels won't win at a clip like that, so they need to get guys who believe their paycheck will be determined by the other things they do.
If you aren't winning 60-70% of your games, guys will start to look out for themselves and their numbers if they think that scoring will get them their next big paycheck.
The Pels won't win at a clip like that, so they need to get guys who believe their paycheck will be determined by the other things they do.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News