Started By
Message

re: Is it wrong to have your photo taken in front of Old Glory or Confederate flag? (long)

Posted on 2/4/19 at 11:14 am to
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33733 posts
Posted on 2/4/19 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Since both parts of America participated in slavery and it began in the north primarily. And died out there first because the north was industry and not fit for rice and indigo growing. And since the idea of slavery began in Britain and France and the granting of large plantations to grow rice, indigo and probably hemp was mostly to sons of wealthy British (and French) is it wrong to wear apparel with the British icon. And fly that flag and the French flag. How about the original slave traders and catchers in the middle east and Africa, some still in business. And what about the Scot, Irish, but mostly England business owners and governments who enslaved and sent the original slaves to America who happened to be white. And the native American tribes who caught and sold native American slaves to rich people.

An argument can be made that the most put upon people in America were the Scots, Irish and British poor who were originally brought here as slaves then some as cannon fodder since many whites in the north wanted no part of fighting the civil war. Or settlement fodder early on with little chance of survival. The poor were put to work in sweat shops and industries in the north even as 9 year olds and many were killed or maimed. And the poor whites in the south who were manipulated into fighting basically 1300 wealthy families fight since they were desperate for a paycheck. And were compelled by the draft to fight against their own best interests. Many of whom were worse off than slaves. Since they had no idea how they were going to eat tomorrow and at least the slaves were being fed and housed and clothed. They were natural farmers and struggled to share crop because of slavery. In the short term the south losing the war was the best thing that ever happened since they now had value as share croppers. Before a slave had value and a poor white had none. The idea was floated at the beginning of the war to use slaves to fight but that was quickly shot down by the rich who owned them in favor of using poor whites. Simply because slaves were highly valued and poor whites had zero value.

Slavery was and is horrible. The worst coming out of people of power. Of all races. And the south is still negatively affected by the aftermath of it and the civil war economically, educationally and socially. And the poor blacks and whites in the south are still paying a price. Read Rick Bragg's "All over but the shoutin'" to see who most people in the south my age lived. The only thing worse than the south losing the civil war for the average white person in the south would have been for the south to have won it. Even with the vindictiveness of the sham called "reconstruction". Which lead to the ultimate hostility between the races as both were put into competition for survival. So when I see a Confederate flag I see a piece of cloth. A symbol of oppressed people, white and black to some sure but no more than the American flag. And I was raised to look at it (Confederate flag) as a symbol of pride. More manipulation. It means nothing to me since we all are Americans, right or wrong. BTW I served under the American flag back in the sixties but was still regularly and sarcastically reminded of "you rebels this and that" by ignorant whites and blacks. Frick 'em both. The black soldiers hung together and so did the southern white soldiers and there was a reason for that.
The part that you seem to lose in all of this is that only ONE entity was determined to continue forth on the slavers' path...and that is the one associated with the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia. Scotland, Britian, "the North" - they all abolished the slave trade and then slavery itself. Sorry you can't see the difference.

Also, the majority of the iconography associated with the rebel flag was from the 20th century, when it was explicitly invoked as a symbol of white supremacy and Jim Crow. The famous South Carolina "statehouse" flag didn't even go up until 1961 or so - as an overt middle finger to the civil rights movement.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
19765 posts
Posted on 2/4/19 at 11:36 am to
quote:

The famous South Carolina "statehouse" flag didn't even go up until 1961 or so - as an overt middle finger to the civil rights movemen


True, but sometimes you just have to throw that middle finger up.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 2/4/19 at 11:41 am to
quote:

The famous South Carolina "statehouse" flag didn't even go up until 1961 or so - as an overt middle finger to the civil rights movement.


One of the many reasons Aggy is proud to sponsor tBiennial SC Statehouse Desecration and Hootenanny
Posted by jimdog
columbus, ga
Member since Dec 2012
6636 posts
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:14 pm to
I didn't lose sight of anything. You don't get it. Southern poor whites fought for the sons of English elites and French too. Huge plantation owners. Most of the land grants and inheritances began in the late 1600's and were to plant rice and or Indigo. And were passed down generation to generation. Now a few of these plantation owners were sons of wealthy northern leaders of industry. 1387 families basically took the south out of the union. Damn few were southern born white trash. LOL! The same white trash who fought and died for these elites. The same white trash that begat more poor southern whites. Who have born the burden for something they had zero to do with. The flag belongs to the elites. But modern day people have grabbed it as a symbol of pride.

Further Lincoln NEVER invaded the south to end slavery. He invaded to put down the rebellion. Money! There was no income taxes then to run the government. Export taxes on products was a huge source of income and excise taxes on imports. Plus the Confederacy wanted to own the territories and Mexico and South America. And also keep those tax dollars. The 1387 families wanted to enslave, plant and prosper even more and withdrew from the union and formed their own country to beat the north to those territories and yes invade Mexico and expand into S America.

One last thing. Slavery in these United States was alive and well long after it died in Europe. But early European aristocracy fathered American slavery. And sent thousands upon thousands of white slave to America, particularly to the south. And the practice continued a long time. The president who followed Lincoln was a slave as a young man. Yes the president of the United States in the late 1860's was an ex-slave. His mother sold him into slavery for money. Which ws fairly common at the time. He ran away from his master after a time and was hunted by slave catchers. Slavery in the USA lasted almost 200 years. There are few in the south, white or black who doesn't share DNA with an ex slave.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram