re: Andrew Whitworth is Salty about the no call

If you look at this as a blown call, then he is 100% correct. But this was not a blown call. The term blown call implies there was human error. This could not possibly be attributed to human error (no professional ref can be this incompetent). This was an intentional no call by more than one professional ref. So I have to say I think Whitworths scenario does not even fit this situation. This was criminal tampering and no less. Call it what it is and maybe it won't be used so blatantly in the future.