- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pels willing to move 1st pick; Interested in Terrence Ross
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:07 pm to TeddyPadillac
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:07 pm to TeddyPadillac
Jackson has so far been one of the worst, if not the worst, regular rotation players in the league. He actively makes the suns worse
who knows if he will ever get better but right now he is terri-bad
who knows if he will ever get better but right now he is terri-bad
2
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:25 pm to cgrand
So whats the logic behind Ross and a first? If we don't resign him we have 20+M avail for star next year if Solo and wesley is in the package?
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:26 pm to cgrand
It seems clear now that Dell is keeping his powder dry and trying to swing a big deal at the deadline (think Beal or Barnes).
I'm increasingly enamored of the incremental deal, one that gives us a starting level SF and a back up PG.
It would be great if you could swing that in a two-team deal, but getting the right combo might require a third team. The only single team duo I can think of that would work would be Bazemore/Lind from the Hawks for a protected 1st + contracts from us.
Someone posted earlier that the Bucks were interested in moving Brogdon in a deal that includes Randle. I love Brogdon for us (a big PG who can shoot and run an offense). Maybe we could do a deal that included Snell. Not ideal but serviceable at SF though his contract may be a problem.
In general, I think trying to swing for the fences to get a star who will appease Davis and, perhaps, keep him in the fold, is not the correct strategy. This team needs depth and a more balanced roster. Focus on that and hopefully winning is what will keep Davis around.
I'm increasingly enamored of the incremental deal, one that gives us a starting level SF and a back up PG.
It would be great if you could swing that in a two-team deal, but getting the right combo might require a third team. The only single team duo I can think of that would work would be Bazemore/Lind from the Hawks for a protected 1st + contracts from us.
Someone posted earlier that the Bucks were interested in moving Brogdon in a deal that includes Randle. I love Brogdon for us (a big PG who can shoot and run an offense). Maybe we could do a deal that included Snell. Not ideal but serviceable at SF though his contract may be a problem.
In general, I think trying to swing for the fences to get a star who will appease Davis and, perhaps, keep him in the fold, is not the correct strategy. This team needs depth and a more balanced roster. Focus on that and hopefully winning is what will keep Davis around.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News