- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Where is the original 302 for Flynn?
Posted on 12/14/18 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 12/14/18 at 5:39 pm
Anybody?
Posted on 12/14/18 at 5:42 pm to CptBengal
I am not hearing or seeing there is one
Posted on 12/14/18 at 5:44 pm to CptBengal
Why?
It had to be altered to get a charge on Flynn.
It had to be altered to get a charge on Flynn.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 5:45 pm to CptBengal
Any updates on the response to the court's order to produce relevant docs?
Posted on 12/14/18 at 5:46 pm to SOKAL
quote:
Earlier this week, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ordered DOJ to produce the FBI 302 of the FBI interview of Flynn. Those documents were just filed. There is no 302 of the interview. Instead, there's a 302 of an interview of *Strzok* talking about the interview 6 months later. LINK
This post was edited on 12/14/18 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 12/14/18 at 5:47 pm to CptBengal
Must be with Killary's emails and PS text messages.
fricking filth. Hypocrisy anyone. Burn it down, Trump.
fricking filth. Hypocrisy anyone. Burn it down, Trump.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 5:49 pm to TOPAL
Everytime the FBI interviews someone they make a 302.
Where is the original?
Where is the original?
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:03 pm to CptBengal
Where is the original 302?
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:04 pm to CptBengal
If they can't produce it, sounds like charges against Flynn should be dismissed.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:05 pm to CptBengal
I'm sure Nancy will get to the bottom of this once the Dems are sworn in.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:17 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Earlier this week, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ordered DOJ to produce the FBI 302 of the FBI interview of Flynn. Those documents were just filed. There is no 302 of the interview. Instead, there's a 302 of an interview of *Strzok* talking about the interview 6 months later. LINK
No 302 of the interview of Flynn? It was an important enough interview that it will be the basis for convicting a war hero, but they didn't see fit to reduce it to writing?
And Strzok is the guy we are relying on? Seems like the court could take judicial notice that Pete's credibility varies depending on the adjustment of his butt plug that particular day.
Isn't there supposed to be a log or a work flowchart regularly maintained that should reveal exactly what happened?
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:27 pm to CptBengal
What does it matter whether the agents thought Flynn was lying or not. If there is proof he was lying, is he innocent because the agents didn't think he was lying at the time?
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:30 pm to texridder
The entire basis for the charge is the 302. It is the equivalent of a memorialized conversation/ interview. If the only evidence in a criminal case is a videotaped confession, and said tape is lost or destroyed, bye bye criminal charges.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:31 pm to texridder
Ok show us thr proof slap nuts . Ill wait.
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:47 pm to DreauxB2015
it will never happen, orange man bad no matter what let people get raided @ dawn they don't care. Ruin a career military man's life and cause him to lose his home-they don't care. If Obama and the Clinton's lawyers were raided at dawn what would the media do and say?
Posted on 12/14/18 at 6:56 pm to Scoop
This post was edited on 12/14/18 at 7:01 pm
Posted on 12/14/18 at 7:13 pm to Scoop
quote:
Where is the original 302 for Flynn?
Why?
It had to be altered to get a charge on Flynn.
BINGO!!!!!! Give the man a cigar!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News