- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Yahoo League Commishes: Are Yall Allowing Samuels to be Started in the TE Spot?
Posted on 12/4/18 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 12/4/18 at 3:55 pm
I've seen different takes on twitter regarding this.
Wondering if anyone here is preventing starting Samuels as a TE, since he's always played as an RB.
Wondering if anyone here is preventing starting Samuels as a TE, since he's always played as an RB.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 3:58 pm to OneMoreTime
If Yahoo has him eligible, then he should be eligible...end of story
Posted on 12/4/18 at 4:10 pm to OneMoreTime
As someone who has to play against Samuels in the TE slot, to not allow it is ridiculous. If that’s how he’s designated, that’s how he should be played. I’m not happy about it, but that’s the way it should be.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 4:15 pm to OneMoreTime
That’s doing too much, IMO. If Yahoo says he can play tight end, he can play tight end on that site
Posted on 12/4/18 at 4:22 pm to OneMoreTime
Unless you have predetermined rules, your league show play by the law of the platform.
TY Montgomery was a RB/WR 2 years ago
TY Montgomery was a RB/WR 2 years ago
Posted on 12/4/18 at 4:26 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:Because he played both positions.
TY Montgomery was a RB/WR 2 years ago
The difference is that Samuels hasn't played a snap of TE in his career and yahoo is the only site listing him as a TE. So it basically looks like they fricked up
That's why I can see it both ways
This post was edited on 12/4/18 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 12/4/18 at 4:56 pm to Jizzamo311
quote:
If Yahoo has him eligible, then he should be eligible...end of story
only answer
Posted on 12/4/18 at 4:58 pm to OneMoreTime
He worked out with the TEs at the combine as well as playing some H Back/TE at NC State. It isn’t a “frick up” as much as it is Pitt using in a different role than he was thought to occupy coming into the season. It is what it is
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:12 pm to OneMoreTime
I just picked him up in my league and he is in my TE spot. I just hope it pans out for me cause I’m sitting Kittle.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:17 pm to DallasTiger45
The Steelers drafted him with the intention of him playing RB and he practiced their from day one. What he entered the league in the combine isn’t pertinent. Yahoo never should have given him dual eligibility because he never had two positions. This isn’t like a mccluster situation where he legit played both but was forced into a bigger role due to injury. Yahoo is the only platform giving him this. Yahoo’s position on this is flat out wrong.
That being said, if they don’t fix it then you have to go with it I guess
That being said, if they don’t fix it then you have to go with it I guess
This post was edited on 12/4/18 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:22 pm to BilJ
I agree with you. Yahoo is wrong. But as long as that’s how he’s designated, I can’t fault my opponent for playing within the rules.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:24 pm to OneMoreTime
You can’t change it now & it’s not fair if yahoo does either
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:36 pm to Lester Earl
Meh....I think they should have to fix errors used to exploit a glitch. Never should have had the distinction. I get some picked him up hoping to exploit this loop hole, doesn’t mean they should be rewarded for it. Play him at the position he’s been designated at from the start
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:19 pm to OneMoreTime
Marques Colston was listed as a TE his rookie year. It was awesome.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 8:59 pm to OneMoreTime
So far I've dropped Samuels, Lamar and Blount all before they blew up. I need to learn patience.
Posted on 12/5/18 at 6:41 am to BilJ
I think it’s bullshite that he’s listed as a TE when no other fantasy app has him listed that way. Whatver lucky bastard that gets him can have essentially a RB at TE. Doesn’t seem fair.
Posted on 12/5/18 at 7:13 am to AUtigerNOLA
quote:
Whatver lucky bastard that gets him can have essentially a RB at TE. Doesn’t seem fair.
I'll fight the good fight and not start Samuel as a TE. I've got Ertz there instead
Posted on 12/5/18 at 8:04 am to AUtigerNOLA
Agreed it’s essentially allowing a cheat code but they aren’t going to fix it. Best you can hope for is that it blows up in your opponent’s face and Samuels has much less of a role than anticipated
Posted on 12/5/18 at 8:16 am to OneMoreTime
This is when using a free service means you get what you pay for. I'm in two leagues, one we pay CBS (Commissioner League) for and the other is Yahoo which we do for free. CBS is on top of their game and puts effort into making sure things like this are legit. Yahoo clearly just does the basics and this type of thing is what free sites don't care to fix.
That being said, we are going with what both sites have him listed as. It would not be fair to change what the site has him designated as unless, as a previous poster stated, your league has this type of situation written in their rules.
That being said, we are going with what both sites have him listed as. It would not be fair to change what the site has him designated as unless, as a previous poster stated, your league has this type of situation written in their rules.
This post was edited on 12/5/18 at 8:17 am
Posted on 12/5/18 at 9:46 am to OneMoreTime
I went ahead and sent Yahoo a note about how they were wrong. Thought it was worth a shot.
Popular
Back to top


11








