- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 19 of 20 World Leaders Just Pledged to Fight Climate Change. Trump Was the Lone Holdout.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:04 pm to bmy
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:04 pm to bmy
quote:
In response to a question asking exactly how much of the change is anthropogenic.
I said an exact measurement is impossible but we could determine a useful number
Joke??
0
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:10 pm to bmy
quote:
Stop being emotional and start using your brain
You're projecting again.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:19 pm to DavidTheGnome
They want to change Summer into winter, fall into spring? They all need the money. Because most of funds will come from all of us selfish workers in the US. Obviously their socialist economy doesn't bring in enough bucks to spread to their leaders. Can't they figure out that capitalism works and their socialism will always need money for failure?
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:21 pm to bmy
quote:
Stop being emotional and start using your brain
Oh yeah, my side is the emotional one... try again, you are getting very close to mental gymnastics gold medal... what a fricking putz...
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:25 pm to bmy
quote:
determine a useful number
Yeah, and here is where you fail miserably...
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:26 pm to DavidTheGnome
logged in just to downvote you.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:32 pm to Dale51
quote:
You're projecting again.
Someone not living up to their own standard makes them a hypocrite. It does not automatically invalidate their argument.
It's a common fallacy.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:34 pm to DavidTheGnome
France says they're going to save the planet by reducing CO2, then lights half the capital city on fire 
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:34 pm to The Maj
quote:
Yeah, and here is where you fail miserably...
Are you claiming that it is impossible to calculate.. or that it is currently impossible to calculate?
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:35 pm to bmy
Should we start raising taxes to battle environmental concerns ? Let’s get you on the record here
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:36 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
But being the lone voice claiming it’s a hoax makes us look backwards and ignorant
You sound like a big ol twat
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:37 pm to bmy
quote:
Someone not living up to their own standard makes them a hypocrite
Thats nice.
Facts not in evidence.
Begging the Question Fallacy...again
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:37 pm to bmy
quote:
Stop being emotional and start using your brain
This is blatant projection.
He just laid out facts (I challenge you to refute them) on the behavior of these climate change champions.
Whereas you, and your ilk, are ALL about the emotions of SAVE THE PLANET, IT HAS A FEVER.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:43 pm to bmy
quote:
Are you claiming that it is impossible to calculate.. or that it is currently impossible to calculate?
"It"..has to first be established as a factual phenomenon. It hasn't been established as anything more than a "common sense" conclusion.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:43 pm to NIH
quote:
Should we start raising taxes to battle environmental concerns ? Let’s get you on the record here
In the south eastern US we absolutely should if you enjoy the outdoors and clean air. Some other states like california are probably too burdensome as is.
But I don't think it should be done via traditional tax. I think it should be done via harsh penalties/fines against polluters.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:45 pm to bmy
quote:
But I don't think it should be done via traditional tax. I think it should be done via harsh penalties/fines against polluters.
"Polluters" is typically a catch all term that environmental whackos use to take control. You're gonna have to be far more specific.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:47 pm to bmy
Define polluter
Are we talking person with large vehicle or a huge plant?
Are we talking person with large vehicle or a huge plant?
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:48 pm to bmy
quote:
I think it should be done via harsh penalties/fines against polluters.
Don't those already exist?? What "polluters" don't face consequences? Joe Blow can get a 250. fine for throwing a non polluting glass bottle out the window.
But maybe I'm not understanding your metric?? What types of penalties and fine are you suggesting for what level of "polluting"?
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:48 pm to Dale51
quote:
"It"..has to first be established as a factual phenomenon. It hasn't been established as anything more than a "common sense" conclusion.
It has been established
the debate is now concerned with the amount of impact This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 12/3/18 at 3:51 pm to Dale51
quote:
Don't those already exist??
They exist but conservative politicians in the south do not allow them to be used freely.
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 3:52 pm
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News