- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:59 am to Joshjrn
When you're trying to prove things beyond a reasonable doubt, the 10-2 thing seems merely to protect the courts from the unreasonable people.
All these anecdotal stories of people refusing to change their opinion in light of the evidence are stories of people who are not upholding their obligations as a juror. They are not being reasonable.
All these anecdotal stories of people refusing to change their opinion in light of the evidence are stories of people who are not upholding their obligations as a juror. They are not being reasonable.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 10:18 am to Joshjrn
quote:
Still no. Hung jury. State gets to retry.
D'oh! You're right.
Okay then, "were this change to pass that guy would have caused the state to at least double its prosecution costs because he would have had to be tried again".
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News