- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Amendment #2 Vote NO to protect against SJW
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:51 am to Michael Hayes
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:51 am to Michael Hayes
quote:
I was on a jury once and we convicted this black guy for robbery and assault on a business owner who was walking to his vehicle after closing. The evidence was overwhelming and we came back with a 11/12 verdict. The one standout, a black girl, who no matter what, did not want to convict him. Never presented an argument for why she believes he was innocent. Was firm on her decision. Vote NO, guys.
My wife has a similar story, which I have mentioned here before. Was talking about this to my Supv yesterday and he had a similar one as well.
Young black male shot someone, prints on the gun and gun powder on his hands. Jury was 5 black, 7 white and three of the blacks refused to move off their stance of not guilty. Finally one gave in. He then said something that surprised me, the defense attorney came into talk with them after and told them they did the right thing (ie: his client was guilty as hell). Were this change to pass that guy would have been back on the streets with the quickness.
Posted on 11/6/18 at 9:55 am to Bard
quote:
Were this change to pass that guy would have been back on the streets with the quickness.
Still no. Hung jury. State gets to retry.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News