Started By
Message
locked post

What are the realistic military options to stop the migrant invasion?

Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:40 pm
Posted by Sody Cracker
Distemper Ward
Member since May 2016
3409 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:40 pm
I seriously doubt our troops will fire on unarmed people, so that leaves us with rubber bullets and tear gas. What else is there?

I think the migrants need killing, but I don't see it happening.
Posted by UFMatt
Trump / Vance country
Member since Oct 2010
11938 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:42 pm to
mine fields, large warning signs to let them know not to cross.
Posted by volnavy
Fair wind and following seas
Member since Jan 2009
748 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:46 pm to
None, if we were serious troops would already be mobilizing.
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:47 pm to
Build a fricking Wall...
Posted by Pussykat
South Louisiana
Member since Oct 2016
3889 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:49 pm to
Throw a big net on them, scoop them up, ship them back to Central America??
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
16300 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:52 pm to
Water cannons.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
22407 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:55 pm to
Douglas AC-47s

18000 rounds/minute
This post was edited on 10/22/18 at 3:00 pm
Posted by tigerinDC09
Washington, DC
Member since Nov 2011
4741 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Build a fricking Wall...


The large majaority are seeking asylum. A wall wouldn't matter because they are trying to enter a legal border crossings.
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5807 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

The large majaority are seeking asylum.


If that were true, they could have stopped at any embassy or consulate to make their request along the way. If they survive a trip all the way through Mexico, clearly they aren’t in as mortal danger as we are expected to believe.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
82343 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

The large majaority are seeking asylum. A wall wouldn't matter because they are trying to enter a legal border crossings.


14,000 of them? En masse?

Not even you believe that.
Posted by braindeadboxer
Utopia
Member since Nov 2011
8742 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:07 pm to
An unarmed invasion is an invasion none the less.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

I seriously doubt our troops will fire on unarmed people, so that leaves us with rubber bullets and tear gas. What else is there?

I think the migrants need killing, but I don't see it happening.


Nonsense to firing on them. All we have to is keep them in Mexico until Mexico gets sick of them. That means any that are actually caught crossing the border are immediately escorted back across and if Mexico dares to attempt to stop that, well they won't.

These idiots scatter when they see a pickup with twi ICE agents , what are they gonna do if they see a Humvee full of soldiers?
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
92674 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:09 pm to
A-10 Warthogs
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
11394 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:11 pm to
Doesnt matter who believes it, it is a legal process. Asylum claims have to be adjudicated. Why do you think Trump has been trying to get Congress off it’s arse to do something to correct the system.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
23178 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:13 pm to
There is no acceptable military solution to this issue, unless the military is just going to be used for crowd control.
Posted by Uncs
Member since Aug 2008
3080 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:14 pm to
Maybe we should get some Rich Republican to back The Hells Angels and send about 5,000 bikers down there for a Rally!
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Doesnt matter who believes it, it is a legal process. Asylum claims have to be adjudicated. Why do you think Trump has been trying to get Congress off it’s arse to do something to correct the system.


bullshite, by international treaty asylum seekers are required to seek asylum in the first safe nation they can get to, AND they are required to follow the laws of that country, which means coming in through a port of entry AND means complying with notices to appear and such. LIke 4% of all invaders go to court and of those about 85% claim they need asylum and of those claims almost 89% are rejected because they have no claim of amnesty.

These assholes aren't seeking amnesty that's just something stupid liberals convince themselves of.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
144198 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:18 pm to
You've arranged to meet them at the border and give them all your money, right?

Wait, you don't care either?

We know.
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

seeking asylum


Did you get that from your news source?
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5807 posts
Posted on 10/22/18 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Asylum claims have to be adjudicated.


They can make asylum requests where they are. We aren’t obligated to let people in who intend to claim asylum once inside.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram