- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 10/9/18 at 4:34 pm to Antonio Moss
Posted on 10/9/18 at 4:34 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
You fundamentally misunderstand the EC. States already have this power if they so chose to exercise it
No I don’t. States can split up their electoral votes but the number of votes that a state has is still based on the population of that state, giving some states with smaller populations an advantage. Thus a rural vote in Wyoming is still weighted more heavily than a rural vote in New York State, even if electors divvy up the votes in both cases.
I’m talking about redrawing the entire electoral college, not based on state lines at all. Based on county.
This post was edited on 10/9/18 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 10/9/18 at 4:37 pm to cahoots
As I said before the electoral college doesn’t benefit rural voters. It benefits rural voters in certain states with low populations. It does nothing for small town folks in Texas or New York. That’s the reality.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 4:45 pm to cahoots
quote:The only ones who care about the "advantage" you are talking about are the ones who already wanted to move to a NPV because there's no real advantage to be had as a citizen living in the state of Wyoming. What does it matter if their vote has more "weight" or "power" or "force" or whatever word you want to use if the end result is 3 electoral votes out of over 500?
No I don’t. States can split up their electoral votes but the number of votes that a state has is still based on the population of that state, giving some states with smaller populations an advantage. Thus a rural vote in Wyoming is still weighted more heavily than a rural vote in New York State, even if electors divvy up the votes in both cases.
The compromise rewards states with higher populations while giving a little bit of a say to those states with very small populations. In the end, Wyoming still has a say for the POTUS, even if it's a small one compared to California or New York. At the same time, California still has a very, very big say in who becomes POTUS because they have a lot of people. They just aren't given such a big say that they can bully the rest of the country. And that's perfectly in-line with the founders' thinking on governance.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 5:05 pm to cahoots
quote:
I’m talking about redrawing the entire electoral college, not based on state lines at all. Based on county.
The entire basis of the EC is maintain state power over the federal government. Like I said, you fundamentally misunderstand the EC.
This post was edited on 10/9/18 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 10/9/18 at 5:15 pm to cahoots
Liberals hate the Constitution
Posted on 10/9/18 at 5:38 pm to cahoots
quote:Muh anti-federalism!
I’m talking about redrawing the entire electoral college, not based on state lines at all. Based on county.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News