- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Veto? AP for Bell
Posted on 9/13/18 at 9:57 am to DeathValley85
Posted on 9/13/18 at 9:57 am to DeathValley85
Those of you against how would any trade get vetoed if you have to "prove" collusion? Hire a private eye or attain a subpoena for their text and email records? Everyone would be making side deals if this was the standard. He turned down Hyde for Ingram and then accepted AP for a top 3 player.
If Bell reports tomorrow and AP gets hurt, very likely, the next day?
"Oops our bad..."
If Bell reports tomorrow and AP gets hurt, very likely, the next day?
"Oops our bad..."
5
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:01 am to Mr. Wayne
quote:
He turned down Hyde for Ingram and then accepted AP for a top 3 player.
Use AP for 3 weeks until Ingram gets back.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:03 am to Mr. Wayne
quote:
He turned down Hyde for Ingram
Again, what's the problem with that?
quote:
If Bell reports tomorrow and AP gets hurt, very likely, the next day?
What?
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:05 am to Mr. Wayne
quote:
Those of you against how would any trade get vetoed if you have to "prove" collusion? Hire a private eye or attain a subpoena for their text and email records? Everyone would be making side deals if this was the standard. He turned down Hyde for Ingram and then accepted AP for a top 3 player.
If Bell reports tomorrow and AP gets hurt, very likely, the next day?
"Oops our bad..."
you can't use you're own speculation as a reason to veto a trade - its just as valid as the other persons speculation.
This some bullshite, you can't use you're own speculation as a reason to veto a trade - its just as valid as the other persons speculation.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:18 am to Mr. Wayne
No one is likely colluding after week one.
You can’t veto trades based on hypotheticals you’ve made up in your head.
Would I make the trade? Nope. But as others have said, it’s not your job to manage his team. Sounds like the owner wants to trade AP’s known workload for the unknown of the Bell situation. Short sighted maybe but justifiable.
quote:
If Bell reports tomorrow and AP gets hurt, very likely, the next day?
You can’t veto trades based on hypotheticals you’ve made up in your head.
Would I make the trade? Nope. But as others have said, it’s not your job to manage his team. Sounds like the owner wants to trade AP’s known workload for the unknown of the Bell situation. Short sighted maybe but justifiable.
Posted on 9/13/18 at 10:49 am to Mr. Wayne
quote:
Those of you against how would any trade get vetoed if you have to "prove" collusion?
The quick answer is that no trade would get vetoed, and that’s the point. Why is the rest of the league able to dictate who I trade? You don’t think there were some NFL teams that would have vetoed the Khalil Mack trade if given the chance? But it’s not their team so they don't have a say unless someone is cheating, you let the trade go through.
If I was in your league and had that trade vetoed I'd probably ask for my money back and quit the league.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News