- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Levin: Cohen plea means nothing
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:41 pm
Since payments to the whores weren't out of campaign funds, they're not illegal. Trying to influence election means nothing int he eyes of the law.
eta: Said on Hannity
eta: Said on Hannity
This post was edited on 8/21/18 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:42 pm to NikolaiJakov
Levin forgot about in-kind contributions...
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:43 pm to NikolaiJakov
quote:
Levin
quote:
means nothing
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:46 pm to BamaAtl
Even then the sum of these contributions would literally cause a small arse fine
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:50 pm to BamaAtl
Former Commissioner, Vice Chairman and Chairman of the Federal Election Commission (2000 and 2005) Professor Bradley Smith
https://www.wsj.com/articles/stormy-weather-for-campaign-finance-laws-1523398987
He did not.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/stormy-weather-for-campaign-finance-laws-1523398987
quote:
Shortly before the 2016 election, one of President Trump’s lawyers, Michael Cohen, arranged a $130,000 payment to the porn star in return for silence about a 2006 affair she claimed to have had with Mr. Trump. (Both the president and Mr. Cohen have denied the affair; Mr. Trump has said he did not know of the payment to Ms. Daniels until this February.)
Not satisfied with an old-fashioned sex scandal—perhaps because the president seems impervious to that—some want to turn this into a violation of campaign-finance law. Trevor Potter, a former member of the Federal Election Commission told “60 Minutes” the payment was “a $130,000 in-kind contribution by Cohen to the Trump campaign, which is about $126,500 above what he’s allowed to give.” The FBI raided Mr. Cohen’s office, home and hotel room Monday. They reportedly seized records related to the payment and are investigating possible violations of campaign-finance laws.
But let’s remember a basic principle of such laws: Not everything that might benefit a candidate is a campaign expense.
Campaign-finance law aims to prevent corruption. For this reason, the FEC has a longstanding ban on “personal use” of campaign funds. Such use would give campaign contributions a material value beyond helping to elect the candidate—the essence of a bribe.
FEC regulations explain that the campaign cannot pay expenses that would exist “irrespective” of the campaign, even if it might help win election. At the same time, obligations that would not exist “but for” the campaign must be paid from campaign funds.
If paying hush money is a campaign expense, a candidate would be required to make that payment with campaign funds. How ironic, given that using campaign funds as hush money was one of the articles of impeachment in the Watergate scandal, which gave rise to modern campaign-finance law.
quote:
Levin forgot about in-kind contributions...
He did not.
This post was edited on 8/21/18 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:50 pm to BamaAtl
Tru but was this payoff for actions before Trump even thought about running for Pres?
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:51 pm to TJGator1215
Even if it is, who cares. He paid them out of his own pocket. If that violates campaign finance laws, then the laws are flawed.
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:51 pm to TJGator1215
What's your legal background?
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:55 pm to NIH
quote:
What's your legal background?
He watched perry mason once
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:56 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Levin forgot about in-kind contributions...
no
Posted on 8/21/18 at 8:57 pm to someoneBEE
That’s a great find.
That pretty much shows that Cohen’s remarks hold no water legally.
That pretty much shows that Cohen’s remarks hold no water legally.
Posted on 8/21/18 at 9:00 pm to NIH
quote:
What's your legal background?
He took Jeffrey Toobin's correspondence course
Posted on 8/21/18 at 9:01 pm to NikolaiJakov
Just subpoena the candy corn and get this over.
Oh yea! Let Mueller give Cohen immmnity the day before they subpoena the President.
Oh yea! Let Mueller give Cohen immmnity the day before they subpoena the President.
Posted on 8/21/18 at 9:02 pm to OchoDedos
He sucked 3 dicks this weekend
Posted on 8/21/18 at 9:02 pm to NikolaiJakov
You don't plead guilty to a crime unless you are worried they are going to hang you out to dry for a worse crime.
But by all means...nothing to see here right?
Posted on 8/21/18 at 9:03 pm to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:
Just subpoena the candy corn and get this over.
So it will be deemed unconstitutional? Good idea.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News