Started By
Message

re: Gary Oldman in Darkest Hour

Posted on 8/20/18 at 1:14 pm to
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22856 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 1:14 pm to
Good transformational performance, yes, and incredible, yes,...

but when you have a role with that much makeup and once you find the voice you want, those parts are not as difficult many make them out to be because you have so many secondary elements to immerse yourself in the role.

Honestly, playing an everyman or a character where it's only you and the camera, that's a far more difficult "great" performance to pull off.

That's why I always thought Cruise was so much better in Rain Man than Hoffman. Cruise had the hard role, Hoffman just had to find his place and then go with a "one note" character.

Cruise had to really carry the story along, with no real gimmicks, all while being an a-hole that you liked... Much more difficult to pull off.

It's why I also thought Rourke was so good in the Wrestler... It was just him, opening a vein for the character. No prosthetics, no accent, no limp, no nothing. Just a beaten down man.
This post was edited on 8/20/18 at 1:15 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram