Started By
Message

re: What is the justification for drug testing football players for non-performance enhancing.

Posted on 8/10/18 at 2:19 pm to
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14012 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

same as because they say so....still no justification for their rule other than we are the NCAA, you want to play, then do what we say


The justification is that players gain an unfair advantage by using PEDs. How hard is this to comprehend?
Posted by tigbit
Member since Jun 2011
2800 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

The justification is that players gain an unfair advantage by using PEDs. How hard is this to comprehend?



You obviously didn't read the OP. We are not talking about PEDs, we are talking about "street drugs"
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16036 posts
Posted on 8/11/18 at 8:37 am to
quote:

The justification is that players gain an unfair advantage by using PEDs. How hard is this to comprehend?

the OP didn't ask about PED's he asked about recreational drugs. Someone answered that the ncaa doesn't test for recreational drugs only PEDs. Question answered, end of thread.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram