- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge forces high-schoolers to share showers with opposite sex
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:03 pm to Centinel
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:03 pm to Centinel
quote:
This is already happening. Throw the gay community in the mix as well.
They're already at each other's throats and it's glorious.
Oh, I know. But can you imagine the kind of gasoline an incident like that will pour on the fire?
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:03 pm to Zach
Geez man.... don't give them any new ideas!
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:04 pm to Jjdoc
I agree with the lack of a right to privacy... because it’s not in the goddamn constitution and was only thought up as part of Griswold v Connecticut, over birth control laws.
Still doesn’t make this decision any less stupid.
Especially since that first quote essentially says that choosing to attend school pretty much eliminates the parent’s right to complain.
Still doesn’t make this decision any less stupid.
Especially since that first quote essentially says that choosing to attend school pretty much eliminates the parent’s right to complain.
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:05 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
quote:Once the parents have chosen to send their children to school, their liberty interest in their children's education is severely diminished.
I thought school attendance was compulsory?
And so are your taxes!
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:06 pm to Jjdoc
quote:The kids dont become chihuahuas when they enter the school system.
he judge said, he wasn’t convinced that the students had a “fundamental right to privacy cognizable under the 14th Amendment.”
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:14 pm to teke184
quote:
I agree with the lack of a right to privacy... because it’s not in the goddamn constitution and was only thought up as part of Griswold v Connecticut, over birth control laws.
Still doesn’t make this decision any less stupid.
Especially since that first quote essentially says that choosing to attend school pretty much eliminates the parent’s right to complain.
This is what kind of stupid logic that is a result of having to use pretzel logic to justify a ruling.
"Parents of freaks who want to use the opposite sex shower have the right to complain , and their children ahve have the right to use whichever shower they want, but parents who disagree have no such right and other kids just have to shower with the opposite sex and deal with it"
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:16 pm to Ebbandflow
frick you
Anybody with a daughter cares
Anybody with a daughter cares
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:21 pm to Jjdoc
No, just no.
No parent, in their right mind, is going to agree to this.
No principal in his right mind would consider letting this become school policy.
This judge is advocating child abuse. I guess coaches and staff should be free to shower with the kids?!
This is the natural result of a "do as thou wilt" philosophy devoid of absolute truth.
No parent, in their right mind, is going to agree to this.
No principal in his right mind would consider letting this become school policy.
This judge is advocating child abuse. I guess coaches and staff should be free to shower with the kids?!
This is the natural result of a "do as thou wilt" philosophy devoid of absolute truth.
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:23 pm to Perfect Circle
If Republicans weren't such idiots they could take advantage of these types of things pissing off young women. I mean the DNC supports forcing women to shower with me and allowing men to beat the shite out of women in what is supposed to be women's sports. Talk about a war on women.
But alas, Republicans are stupid.
But alas, Republicans are stupid.
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:24 pm to TJGator1215
More right wing conspiracy bullshite
LINK
quote:
In January 2008, Hernandez was one of three candidates recommended by a six-member judicial selection committee to replace Garr King on the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.[11] President George W. Bush selected Hernandez to fill the vacancy on the District Court of Oregon and submitted his nomination on July 23, 2008.[2] SenatorsGordon H. Smith and Ron Wyden supported the nomination, but it was made with less than six months remaining in the Bush Presidency.[2][12] The nomination was not acted upon by the 110th Congress and was thus returned.[13] Republican Gordon Smith was defeated for re-election in 2008, and newly elected President Barack Obamarestarted the judicial selection process for the District of Oregon.[3] Democrat Ron Wyden recommended Hernandez in addition to five other candidates selected by a thirteen-member judicial selection committee.[12] On July 14, 2010, Obama renominated Hernandez to replace Garr King.[14] He is one of few people to be nominated to the federal bench by presidents from two different political parties.
LINK
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:24 pm to Ebbandflow
quote:
Your article sucks. Who cares?
Well this tells me Mr. GenderFluid doesn't have a daughter. Or probably any kids.
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:25 pm to Perfect Circle
Can we get a legit news article link so we can see the whole picture instead of a conspiracy theory website?
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:26 pm to TJGator1215
quote:
More right wing conspiracy bullshite
Was Hernandez nominated and confirmed during the Obama administration or not?
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:27 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
This is what kind of stupid logic that is a result of having to use pretzel logic to justify a ruling.
"Parents of freaks who want to use the opposite sex shower have the right to complain , and their children ahve have the right to use whichever shower they want, but parents who disagree have no such right and other kids just have to shower with the opposite sex and deal with it"
And yet the same judge will throw out any contractual obligations the same child may have in a court?
Lenders, get thee to the public schools! These kids CAN make valid legal decisions while in attendance. Sell some cars, sell some high end computers, phones, even real estate. (scam guaranteed loans run rampant! Fed Insured Programs run amok! all future headlines)
Kids can make decisions for themselves except in regards to "this" but not "that", legally binding decisions??? So judges get get to pick and choose what children are and are not capable of legally deciding on a personally conjectural basis? They can choose their Identity, their gender, their sexuality but cannot enter other legally binding decisions regarding morals, finances, etc.? How does a Juvenile Court even exist anymore?
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:27 pm to TJGator1215
quote:
More right wing conspiracy bull shite
What are you talking about dip shite. The comment was made that he was appointed by Obama, and he was.
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:29 pm to TJGator1215
quote:
Can we get a legit news article link so we can see the whole picture instead of a conspiracy theory website?
Here you go you lazy frick. Four seconds to google this:
NYT Article for the lazy piece of shite proggies
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:31 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
He was selected by both Bush and Obama you Moron.
Here's a legit article on the case. The judge said it's up to the parents to remove their kids but the court's will not allow discrimination to take place due to the civil rights of students
LINK
Idk why you guys keep posting conspiracy theory bs but makes you guys looked unhinged to the rest of normal society.
Here's a legit article on the case. The judge said it's up to the parents to remove their kids but the court's will not allow discrimination to take place due to the civil rights of students
quote:
A federal judge in Oregon ruled this week that transgender students have a right to use restrooms that match the gender they identify with.
Judge Marco Hernández of Federal District Court in Portland on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit filed against the Dallas School District by Parents for Privacy last year seeking to eliminate a policy that previously allowed a transgender boy to use the boys' locker rooms, restrooms and showers at Dallas High School, The New York Times reported.
Hernández said in his 56-page opinion that parents at the school who don't think that transgender students should be able to use the bathrooms that correspond with the gender they identify with are welcome to pull their children from the school.
"It is within (their) right to remove their children from Dallas High School if they disapprove of transgender student access to facilities," Hernandez wrote, also noting that outlined in the state's law is the transgender students' right to be free of discrimination in school.
quote:
Hernández said that forcing transgender students to use restrooms that correspond with the gender they were assigned a birth is a violation of civil rights law.
In his opinion, Hernández also dismissed claims by students and parents who argued that other male students experienced "embarrassment, humiliation, anxiety, intimidation, fear, apprehension and stress produced by using the restroom with students of the opposite sex."
"Forcing transgender students to use facilities inconsistent with their gender identity would undoubtedly harm those students and prevent them from equally accessing educational opportunities and resources," Hernández wrote.
LINK
Idk why you guys keep posting conspiracy theory bs but makes you guys looked unhinged to the rest of normal society.
This post was edited on 7/30/18 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:33 pm to Centinel
How about you idiotss quit using bullshite news sources?
This post was edited on 7/30/18 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 7/30/18 at 12:33 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Why are all libs into pedoish things so weird
Ask this guy Ebbandflow. He seems to be the only one so far who doesn't have a problem with what the OP posted about.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News