Started By
Message

re: Bregman or Correa...who has the better career?

Posted on 6/28/18 at 8:54 am to
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22372 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 8:54 am to
And that is what most think, but I am in the minority.

As analytical as Luhnow is, I expect he will reason that his budget won't allow him to keep everyone, and when the numbers crunch, Correa is the most likely to be overpaid on the open market, and he will be fortunate to have a Bregman to fill that hole.

I feel that Springer will be much more affordable, and I also feel that Correa is the most likely to have the big market aspirations. If Correa rights the ship and gets things going offensively until the end of his Astros control, he is a 30 mil/yr candidate.

Thus far, Altuve has proven his worth and is fairly compensated at about 23/yr. Honestly, Correa doesn't have that kind of track record yet, and with injuries, lower average, and higher K's, is he worth more than Altuve?
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278635 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 9:12 am to
quote:

I feel that Springer will be much more affordable,


well yea, he'll be 30. They'll let him walk and replace his bat with kyle tucker


quote:

If Correa rights the ship and gets things going offensivel


lol y'all are acting like he is freddy galvis. he is having a fine year by all standards


quote:

Correa doesn't have that kind of track record yet, and with injuries, lower average, and higher K's, is he worth more than Altuve?



dude, correa is 23, do you realize that?

he is the cornerstone. Plays a more important position. Altuve is 28

as good as Altuve is, he doesn't have near the natural talent & upside that Correa possesses.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram