I don’t disagree with you about her selling China secrets and such - she’s proven she’ll sell anything to anybody, so long as she gets her pockets lined.

However, I’m not fully on board with the idea that Gowdy & Goodlatte are suggesting the FBI used FISA on Clinton or the Clinton Foundation. I think they suspect just the opposite- that the FBI didn’t bother using FISA,(even though it was likely warranted in this case) bc they didn’t WANT to find anything. Which is the exact opposite of what they did in the case of Trump. (I also suspect they were spying on Bernie’s camp and the other Repub candidates as well during the election, but that’s another topic.)

I may be wrong, but that’s just my gut instinct. I don’t think they would go to any sort of trouble to look for anything on anybody in her circle- and certainly not going so far as to spy on them

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by AUstar

Member since Dec 2012

17059 posts

Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:28 pm to CheniereTiger108

quote:
However, I’m not fully on board with the idea that Gowdy & Goodlatte are suggesting the FBI used FISA on Clinton or the Clinton Foundation. I think they suspect just the opposite- that the FBI didn’t bother using FISA,(even though it was likely warranted in this case)

I agree and edited my post above to reflect that. This could be a situation where they want to prove negligence on the FBI's part.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by LSU Wayne

Walker

Member since Apr 2005

4365 posts

Posted on 6/24/18 at 7:39 pm to CheniereTiger108

I wouldn’t put it past her sick and twisted mind to sell info under the assumed name and associated accounts, Diane Reynolds. That’s Chelsea’s alias. She would probably frick over her own family for a buck.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board