- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana Budget 101
Posted on 5/24/18 at 6:02 pm to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 5/24/18 at 6:02 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
So, let's say the spending increases by 3 billion. You need to look at where that money came from. If, for example, that entire 3 billion came from federal funds that are REQUIRED to be used for Medicaid, it is dishonest to say that "the state raised spending" or "the state raised taxes". It's not the state's money, really... the state is just the passthrough agent, the escrow holder of said money.
Like I said, your clueless
Jindal turned down that money, because it required us to begin picking up some of those costs. If we had a deficit before this, how the frick did JBE think we would fill in that gap too?
More taxes, anyone?
Stay in your lane. Because this is notttttttttt it
Posted on 5/24/18 at 6:17 pm to Drunken Crawfish
quote:
That is 100% not true. This chart was from a 2015 LSU/LPHI study (that JBE was touting) showing what the reduction or increase in state spending would be with expansion. Keep in mind that they underestimated the enrollment jump by 75,000 people so these numbers may be even higher
You have to be careful with LPHI stats. LAHCQF sued Rebecca Gee after she tried to cut their contract. LPHI was then given a contract to provide the same services. Now the two operations are providing the same service and offering opposing outcomes. ...if LAHCQF data agrees then its probably good...
Posted on 5/24/18 at 6:17 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Jindal did not cut expenses. When JBE came in... there was no more reserve money to sweep, no more excess property to sell, no more bills to delay paying, no more accounting tricks. The GOP in the legislature approved a 1.3 billion dollar sales tax hike. JBE signed it... but the GOP sent it to him to sign. Sales tax hike lasted two years, it was temporary. Now, two years later... about half of that 1.3 billion is coming from spending cuts, federal tax reform, and better oil and gas prices. So, we can maintain half of the GOP-approved and JBE-signed tax increases from two years ago, or, we can cut spending by that amount.
Now if you’re trying to tell me that JBE is just as useless as Jindal after the oil crash, I’ll give you that.
And every year spending goes up.
And every year we face a budget deficit.
And the “temporary” taxes are expiring.
Can’t wait until JBE the Big tax and spender becomes an ex-governor like Jindal.
Louisiana spends way more than a Southern state should, and our children are leaving while JBE fiddles, and you tell me how we are ripping off our fellow Americans.
We need a reduction of government so that we live within our means.
Why should I be happy that a substantial part of my federal tax cut and my “temporary” taxes are being given as free shite?
Louisiana is one of the most unfriendly states to business and prosperity, but we get more than our fair share of free shite.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 6:40 pm to Gaspergou202
Correction - Louisiana actually had a budget surplus last year for the first time in many years. It was used to pay down debts and restore the rainy day fund. This shows that if you stabilize the budget, you can grow the economy and reduce taxes.
Here's the thing - you could go from a 5% to a 4.5% and cover basically the same budget when you grow the economy (and yes the income tax thing helps too). If you keep growing the economy, you can continue to lower the tax. But cut too much too fast (like Jindal did) and then you lose a ton of doctors, teachers, and college students to other states and you are in an even bigger hole economically and more businesses leave.
Business know that if you aren't growing, you are dying. Cut too much too fast and you put a big dent in the economy.
Here's the thing - you could go from a 5% to a 4.5% and cover basically the same budget when you grow the economy (and yes the income tax thing helps too). If you keep growing the economy, you can continue to lower the tax. But cut too much too fast (like Jindal did) and then you lose a ton of doctors, teachers, and college students to other states and you are in an even bigger hole economically and more businesses leave.
Business know that if you aren't growing, you are dying. Cut too much too fast and you put a big dent in the economy.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 6:50 pm to prokowave
La. Had the worse economy in 2017 of any state. We were one of three states where the economy shrank.
You need to revisit your position. The 1.2 Billion dollar tax increase hammered the state, and the surplus you describe was a result of taxes being raised too much.
You need to revisit your position. The 1.2 Billion dollar tax increase hammered the state, and the surplus you describe was a result of taxes being raised too much.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 6:54 pm to LSUFanHouston
You conveniently forget JBE used one time money, used money from the rainy day fund, added Medicaid Expansion, raised taxes 1.2 Billion dollars, and watched as the state floundered.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 8:27 pm to prokowave
quote:
Correction - Louisiana actually had a budget surplus last year for the first time in many years. It was used to pay down debts and restore the rainy day fund.
So after major temporary taxes and an increase in oil prices we eked out $100 million surplus. Now oil is still up and we got a GOP provided tax infusion. But because of JBE’s wonderful management we have a $650 million dollar deficit.
quote:
This shows that if you stabilize the budget, you can grow the economy and reduce taxes.
This showed the exact opposite!
We did not stabilize the budget despite increasing oil revenue, and we haven’t cut taxes!
quote:
But cut too much too fast (like Jindal did) and then you lose a ton of doctors, teachers, and college students to other states and you are in an even bigger hole economically and more businesses leave.
Bobby Jindal was Governor of Louisiana between 2008 and 2016 during the National financial crisis.
Louisiana spending:
2008 Gov. Bobby Jindal announced on December 11, 2008 that, in light of a $1.2 billion shortfall, a review of government functions was necessary "to eliminate inefficiencies and reduce spending in a strategic way that will help our state in handling the effects of this national economic downturn.”However, according to Jindal, Louisiana was facing "good news" because in December 2008 the real estate market held steady and, while the various other states saw a decline in job opportunities, "Louisiana gained jobs in seven of the 10 months" in 2008. Jindal became the first governor to reject certain programs of the stimulus bill. In February 2009 the Louisiana Workforce Commission reported that although the national unemployment rate increased to 7.6 percent, Louisiana's stood at 5.9 percent.
2008/9 Louisiana spent $29,611,069,662
2009/10 $29,704,582,028
2010/11 $26,055,019,367 Hurricane budgets ending.
2011/12 $25,590,819,058 Re-election.
2012/13 $25,747,899,321
2013/14 $25,614,542,728
2014/15. $25,844.800,000 oil prices that had hovered between $100 and $125 fell to around $50
2015/16 $24,959.200,000
2016/17 $28,356.600,000 JBE’s 1st budget, I detect a big spender here!
2017/18 $29,738.400,000 more spending!
2018/19 projected 1 BILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT reduced to 650 MILLION by GOP Fed tax cuts!
quote:
Business know that if you aren't growing, you are dying. Cut too much too fast and you put a big dent in the economy.
You know what is worse than not growing?
Deficit spending.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 8:31 pm to Gaspergou202
You’re actually suggesting that Republicans in the Louisiana Legislature don’t spend $ like drunken sailors? That’s pretty funny.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 9:03 pm to VOR
All we are saying that they all spend money like drunken sailors so why should we aquiese and go along with giving them more money via tax increases in order that they can go on a bigger spending binge?
Posted on 5/24/18 at 9:43 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Jindal turned down that money, because it required us to begin picking up some of those costs. If we had a deficit before this, how the frick did JBE think we would fill in that gap too?
More taxes, anyone?
Stay in your lane. Because this is notttttttttt it
What cracker jack box is your education from? Because you have no idea how to read a budget.
I'm so far ahead of you in the lane, that you can't ever hope to catch up.
Show me, in the current budget, where we have to pay for future years medicaid spending.
I asked you to show me how much the spending increased due to additional state revenue. Protip... you can't.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 9:46 pm to doubleb
quote:
used one time money, used money from the rainy day fund,
JBE did this only to balance the mid-year budget he inherited from Jindal. Not in any of the full year budgets.
quote:
raised taxes 1.2 Billion dollars,
I seem to recall the GOP legislature voted for that. But... they are blameless, apparently.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 9:48 pm to Gaspergou202
quote:
But because of JBE’s wonderful management we have a $650 million dollar deficit.
Come On, Man!!
We have a 650 million PROJECTED DEFICIT because 1.3 billion of TAX REVENUE is falling off the books.
If the sales tax would have been made permanent... we would be having a discussion about what to do with our huge government surplus, and where we should be cutting taxes.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 9:52 pm to LSUFanHouston
We are paying for previous year's commitments and current commitments and yes we are currently spending $$$$$ on Medicaid Expansion.
We are going to spend even more on Medicaid Expansion next FY and we are currently debating how to pay for it and everything else.
We are going to spend even more on Medicaid Expansion next FY and we are currently debating how to pay for it and everything else.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 9:57 pm to LSUFanHouston
Edwards did what Jindal did, you are correct now.
And Edwards signed the legislation, the legislation he pushed for.
He like Jindal, and the legislature would rather raise taxes, cut TOPS, scare grandma and use LSU as a political football rather than make their film buddies or their nursing home buddies mad and you seem to be taking up for him because he is like the rest.
And Edwards signed the legislation, the legislation he pushed for.
He like Jindal, and the legislature would rather raise taxes, cut TOPS, scare grandma and use LSU as a political football rather than make their film buddies or their nursing home buddies mad and you seem to be taking up for him because he is like the rest.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 10:15 pm to doubleb
quote:
He like Jindal, and the legislature would rather raise taxes, cut TOPS, scare grandma and use LSU as a political football rather than make their film buddies or their nursing home buddies mad and you seem to be taking up for him because he is like the rest
If you say JBE is just a pathetic a leader, and unable to make hard decisions, as Jindal was, I agree 100 percent with you.
What bothers me is the view of many (not necessairly you) on this board, of, "JBE is an awful tax and spend liberal, Jindal was great with finances." It's embarrassingly stupid.
Let the record reflect I'm no fan of JBE. But it's not like the Republicans are pushing great ideas, either.
I'd rather them cut the spending. But if they are not going to cut spending, I'll choose higher taxes over the chicanery and games that Jindal pulled. If Jindal and the legislature would have cut spending to an appropriate level, instead of passing make believe budgets and one-time stuff, we would not be dealing with any of this right now.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 10:20 pm to LSUFanHouston
I'll take no taxes and let's keep playing the game Jindal played, rather than playing Edwards' game.
Both juggle the books. Both use rainy day money. Neither rolled back nursing home rules, eliminated Hollywood favors or hurt their backers.
One is all about raising taxes.
Both juggle the books. Both use rainy day money. Neither rolled back nursing home rules, eliminated Hollywood favors or hurt their backers.
One is all about raising taxes.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 10:37 pm to doubleb
quote:
Both juggle the books. Both use rainy day money.
JBE hasn't done this except for the budget he inherited from Jindal (it was a July-June budget and he took office in January). That's not on JBE.
For the two budgets JBE has been responsible for, this hasn't happened (instead, they did the sales tax thing).
Again I ask, if JBE is all about raising taxes... why is he not asking for the entire 1.3B to be renewed? Because if he did that, and got it passed, he could increase spending by 650 million. That, to me, is what a tax and spend liberal does.
To me, the games Jindal played are the same level of irresponsibility that causes the clowns in DC to continue to run up debts. Yes, you may save money today, but you are absolutely screwing future generations. How is that acceptable?
Do you mind me asking how old you are? I'm in my late 30s. And I'm sick thinking of how all these politicians are completely screwing the next few generations. I've always accepted the fact that I won't have any meaningful Social Security income, and I'll have to pay higher taxes to pay off today's debts. And so when you say you would rather games than higher taxes... it makes me think you don't care about the future... only about today.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 11:23 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
A lot of these monies are restricted in spending use. For example, there may be a rule that says fees paid to camp in a state park, can only be used for expenses in the state park system. These fees can't be used to pay for TOPS. This is the majority of state revenue.
How much of this money is restricted only due to statute? Meaning, how much is actually constitutionally protected and how much is legislatively mandated?
Also, how much state spending is part of a match that is spent to unlock federal funds?
Posted on 5/25/18 at 12:04 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
What cracker jack box is your education from? Because you have no idea how to read a budget
:sigh:
A wise lawyer once told me not to ask a question you don't already know the answer to. Because the answer you get, could make you look foolish. So here goes:
I have 2 degrees, both from LSU. And since you claim that its a 'cracker jack box' education, then you shouldn't have any problem with the cuts being made in higher ed. Also, for the last 23 years, I have been the final authority for budgeting and executing said budget for the largest employer in our area
Posted on 5/25/18 at 7:25 am to LSUFanHouston
I'm a Reagan Republican with principles. I'm in my mid 60s.
Starving govt., limiting taxes, cutting the waste is far better than giving them what they ask for and then watching them and their friends grab it out the cookie jar and we the people are left with some crumbs that spill over.
And you keep saying Edwards could ask for more, he did ask for more when he floated his crazy tax reform and during the special session when he cried there was s Billion dollar cliff when there was not.
Nothing Edwards is doing now is for the future, nothing. And right now our state's economy has shrunk for two strdight years. What does that say about our future, what does it say when we have an outward migration larger than our birth rate and immigration rate?
Sure we educate our kids, but they go to work in Atlanta, Houston or elsewhere. They see a better future elsewhere.
I have grandkids, and I worry about crime, BR, their education, the infrastructure and the important things. Fixing our corrupt system is right up there too, and giving them more money to spend without holding them accountable for what they have now is not the way to go.
Starving govt., limiting taxes, cutting the waste is far better than giving them what they ask for and then watching them and their friends grab it out the cookie jar and we the people are left with some crumbs that spill over.
And you keep saying Edwards could ask for more, he did ask for more when he floated his crazy tax reform and during the special session when he cried there was s Billion dollar cliff when there was not.
Nothing Edwards is doing now is for the future, nothing. And right now our state's economy has shrunk for two strdight years. What does that say about our future, what does it say when we have an outward migration larger than our birth rate and immigration rate?
Sure we educate our kids, but they go to work in Atlanta, Houston or elsewhere. They see a better future elsewhere.
I have grandkids, and I worry about crime, BR, their education, the infrastructure and the important things. Fixing our corrupt system is right up there too, and giving them more money to spend without holding them accountable for what they have now is not the way to go.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News