Hate to say it but the mom may find herself in hot water before this is over as well. LA is a One Party Consent State for recordings meaning that at least one of the people being recorded has to know they are being recorded. In this case, I am not sure the son can consent to that. The teachers obviously didn’t know and at least some of the recordings were just between the teacher and aide while the kid wasn’t there. That is straight up illegal. Especially since the recordings weren’t made in public.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by LSUsmartass

Scompton

Member since Sep 2004

82376 posts

Posted on 4/11/18 at 7:26 am to jbgleason

There are sure to be infringement issues when it comes to confidentially laws of other students being recorded in class.

This post was edited on 4/11/18 at 9:10 am

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by GCTigahs

Member since Oct 2014

2066 posts

Posted on 4/11/18 at 7:40 am to jbgleason

Speaking of which, any word on the actual recording device that was used? Sounded like the teachers were talking into a microphone. Nice

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger

Bat'n Rudge

Member since Oct 2004

57586 posts

Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:23 am to jbgleason

quote:
Hate to say it but the mom may find herself in hot water before this is over as well. LA is a One Party Consent State for recordings meaning that at least one of the people being recorded has to know they are being recorded. In this case, I am not sure the son can consent to that. The teachers obviously didn’t know and at least some of the recordings were just between the teacher and aide while the kid wasn’t there. That is straight up illegal. Especially since the recordings weren’t made in public.

I was thinking the same thing.

1 ...

Report Post

O-T Lounge - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board