Started By
Message

re: First rounder on best O-lineman?

Posted on 3/27/18 at 2:29 pm to
Posted by Magazine St
New Orleans Metro Area
Member since Feb 2015
1623 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 2:29 pm to
The Saints finished as the top rated O-line in the NFL last season, there is no need to take an offensive lineman in the 1st. They should focus on disruptive d-linemen and WRs to get the focus off of Thomas the coming season.
Posted by jamal
Places Unknown
Member since Jan 2013
11081 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 2:30 pm to
Ehhhhh. Armstead is injury prone. Unger is getting up there in age. OL might not be an immediate need but you can never have enough quality lineman.
Posted by tigerterrace
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Sep 2016
3398 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 12:11 am to
Taking a future guard would make a lot of sense. You have to replace Kelemete.

If Peat or Warford goes down you have a player to step in. If Armstead or Ramcyzk goes down Peat can slide to tackle and the guard can move in.

Someone is going down and going to miss some games.

Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
8637 posts
Posted on 3/28/18 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

The Saints finished as the top rated O-line in the NFL last season


Armstead is always hurt, Unger ain't young, Strief retired, we signed an old vet.

O-line is definitely a need, at some point or another.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram