- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spinoff: House Bill 391 re: access to water over private water bottoms
Posted on 3/14/18 at 12:17 pm to TheCurmudgeon
Posted on 3/14/18 at 12:17 pm to TheCurmudgeon
quote:
shall include waters passing over any privately owned water bottom which has a direct natural or man-made inlet or outlet to a state-owned water bottom that is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide of the Gulf of Mexico and the tidally influenced arms and tributaries passing through the coastal areas of this state."
People like the Delacroix Association will just block off the direct natural flows. They are already doing it.
4
Posted on 3/14/18 at 12:24 pm to Me Bite
quote:
People like the Delacroix Association will just block off the direct natural flows. They are already doing it.
Where?
Posted on 3/14/18 at 12:36 pm to Me Bite
quote:
Delacroix Association
Who are they? I want to join.
Posted on 3/14/18 at 12:39 pm to Me Bite
quote:
Delacroix Association
I assume you mean Delacroix Corp?
If so, they are the poster child of how the 2 sides can get along. Not sure I've seen or heard of them blocking canals or chasing off people. I've seen them do some work to help with water levels, but that was more for other reasons, not specifically to exclude fishermen or hunters.
Apache on the other hand....
Posted on 3/14/18 at 12:40 pm to Me Bite
quote:
People like the Delacroix Association will just block off the direct natural flows. They are already doing it.
If it wasn't blocked before March 2, 2018, I don't think they could legally block it...if this became law of course.
That is another part that is fuzzy--does this actually prevent someone from blocking off a canal after that date? I assume it does, but don't recall reading anything that explicitly says such.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News