Well you would be a complete idiot ,but it is in line with something that Cleveland would do. It is not that hard they need a franchise QB so go ahead and take Darnold. How many times will they pass on a Wentz, Goff, or Watson to go for a stud in the draft with the first pick and try to get a QB later on. They need to go get a Franchise QB especially with this draft and build around him.

This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 4:10 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by L.A.

The Mojave Desert

Member since Aug 2003

61457 posts

Posted on 3/7/18 at 4:10 pm to stelly1025

quote:
Well you would be a complete idiot ,but it is in line with something that Cleveland would do. It is not that hard they need a franchise QB so take need to take Darnold. How many times will they pass on a Wentz, Goff, or Watson to go for a stud in the draft with the first pick and try to get a QB later on. They need to go get a Franchise QB especially with this draft and build around him.

How do you rank Sam Darnold, Josh Allen, and Josh Rosen? What order would you put them in?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Weekend Warrior79

Member since Aug 2014

16645 posts

Posted on 3/7/18 at 4:21 pm to stelly1025

quote:
How many times will they pass on a Wentz, Goff, or Watson to go for a stud in the draft with the first pick and try to get a QB later on.

I would normally agree with this, but they have the #1 & #4 picks. Barkley & Chubb will go top 4, so at least 2 of the top 3 QBs will be there at 4. I do not think their is a big risk for them to not take a QB @1 if they do not see a lot of separation between the 3. If they have 1 guy standing out over the others, then they HAVE to take that guy #1.

Other side of the argument, if they don't have 1 of the 3 standing out above the others; chances are this is not the year to use a top pick on QB.

0 ...

Report Post

Saints Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board