- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Govt Assistance and Minimum Wage
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:37 am to Ebbandflow
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:37 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
Lol. I guess you ignore the part where it said that 97% of people in that range would benefit versus the 3% of people in that range they would lose their jobs, thhs a net gain. Please go on further though it's amusing
You have no idea what you're reading. This is cringeworthy
No ill effects
1
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:37 am to RogerTheShrubber
Read it further. You're still not getting that most people would be positively affected by it and 500,000 would lose their job. Overall it will have a positive effect was the result of the findings. You quit reading too soon when you found something that you felt like would aid your point of view
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:38 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
Read it further. You're still not getting that most people would be positively affected by it and 500,000 would lose their job. Overall it will have a positive effect was the result of the findings. You quit reading too soon when you found something that you felt like would aid your point of view
I the CBO is a terrible source. Even it contradicted what you claimed.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:39 am to RogerTheShrubber
I can't tell if you're being serious or not but you seriously need to go back and read that again because right now you're looking pretty stupid
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:39 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I the CBO is a terrible source. Even it contradicted what you claimed
Of course because assumption even though history has no support for your claim is a much better source
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:40 am to stuntman
quote:
Black unemployment used to be right in line w/ White unemployment. That all changed w/ the first min wage laws.
In fact, it was EXPLICITLY stated back then that the reason for jacking up wages artificially was to keep Blacks from getting jobs.
Unions were really "good" at this.
What? Democrat pet policies that harm black people?
Nnnnaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhwwwwwwww.......
This post was edited on 2/19/18 at 1:40 am
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:40 am to TexasTiger86
quote:
Did you seriously just post the same study twice? Also, you have been asking for real life scenarios, and all you give us is a biased study?
Maybe you can show me where minimum wage has been increased to match the GDP has hurt the economy of this country
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:40 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
can't tell if you're being serious or not but you seriously need to go back and read that again because right now you're looking pretty stupid
Yes, you are. After claiming it wouldn't reduce employment your own link proved you wrong.
In California alone job losses would be almost half a million.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:41 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You're just googling shite without even understanding what it means
No you made a mistake and cutting off your reading too soon and got the wrong idea and now you're making a fool out of yourself
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:41 am to Ebbandflow
Are you just completely disregarding the studies about Seattle? It is a modern day example of the problems of artificially raising the minimum wage.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:42 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Yes, you are. After claiming it wouldn't reduce employment your own link proved you wrong.
It showed an overall positive effect just like it always has historically. I never said it wouldn't result in any job losses. You're just making stuff up now
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:43 am to stuntman
quote:
Unions were really "good" at this.
Yeah because unions never helped anyone
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:43 am to Ebbandflow
Then you should have no problem finding real life examples. Please link them.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:44 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
can't tell if you're being serious or not but you seriously need to go back and read that again because right now you're looking pretty stupid
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:44 am to TexasTiger86
quote:
Are you just completely disregarding the studies about Seattle? It is a modern day example of the problems of artificially raising the minimum wage.
There were two studies done on Seattle both which contradict each other. The Washington study what you are referencing has been under intense scrutiny for not being thorough on several parameters. You really should read all sides of an argument.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:44 am to Ebbandflow
I'll post again
LINK
Just one state
quote:
Based on the state's historical minimum wage experience, they estimate California will lose approximately 400,000 jobs by 2022 when $15 is phased in. Retail and food service employees are hit especially hard by wage increases; nearly half of all job loss comes from these industries.
LINK
Just one state
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:45 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
Maybe you can show me where minimum wage has been increased to match the GDP has hurt the economy of this country
Why do you keep moving the goal posts?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:45 am to RogerTheShrubber
And how many will rise above the poverty line?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:46 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
There were two studies done on Seattle both which contradict each other.
Spin away!
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:46 am to Ebbandflow
It's been under intense scrutiny because they came up with results that people didn't want to see.
Page 14 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News