- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Is there any footage of a modern day nuclear test explosion?
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:06 am
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:06 am
I've looked but all I see are videos that have been remastered or still grainy. I know what the "old" nukes looked like - I want to see what a modern day American nuclear explosion looks like. Seems the government would want that type of video to get out and be public as a form of deterrent.
Help me out, OT!
Help me out, OT!

Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:06 am to TDsngumbo
Above ground explosions are banned
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:07 am to DavidTheGnome
Are they really? I did not know that.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:08 am to TDsngumbo
The weapons cause too much havoc to test. Each explosion could obliterate an island.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:08 am to DavidTheGnome
All nuclear testing is banned in all environments.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:09 am to TDsngumbo
The modern weapons are exponentially more powerful than the 2 we dropped on Japan.
Way too damaging to test.
ETA:
I believe we have some that are 3 or 4 thousand times more powerful than those.
Think about that.
Way too damaging to test.
ETA:
I believe we have some that are 3 or 4 thousand times more powerful than those.
Think about that.
This post was edited on 2/9/18 at 11:12 am
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:11 am to TDsngumbo
US testing is done theoretically using supercomputer models now.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:11 am to TDsngumbo
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:11 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
The modern weapons are exponentially more powerful than the 2 we dropped on Japan.
Way too damaging to test.
This is only making me want to see video of it even more

Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:12 am to TheCaterpillar
The most powerful bomb ever was tested in the 50s, way more powerful than today's tactical nukes. Lol at this "too powerful to test" BS.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:15 am to TDsngumbo
North Koreans are the only ones who still test them from time to time, but everything they do is inside of a mountain. There has been a few treaties that most of the major have agreed to in some part over the years not to test them above ground, in space, or not at all. Most major powers stopped testing all together in the 60's and early 70's.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:16 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
Are they really? I did not know that.
It's been that way for decades
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:19 am to TDsngumbo
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:19 am to TDsngumbo
Nuclear testing fricked up all the radio dating methods. Now we don't know how old the earth really is. So what. Who cares.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:21 am to TDsngumbo
Check out the youtube footage of Tsar Bomba
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:21 am to Cocotheape
quote:
tactical nukes
Ever heard of a strategic nuke?
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:24 am to Cocotheape
quote:So far from the truth. The most powerful, latest nuke at the moment is not a tactical nuke.
The most powerful bomb ever was tested in the 50s, way more powerful than today's tactical nukes. Lol at this "too powerful to test" BS.
quote:You probably don't fully grasp the implications of that statement.
Lol at this "too powerful to test" BS.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:47 am to Cocotheape
quote:
The most powerful bomb ever was tested in the 50s, way more powerful than today's tactical nukes. Lol at this "too powerful to test" BS.
Aaaand a guy that doesn't know what he's talking about
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:50 am to crazyLSUstudent
quote:
All nuclear testing is banned in all environments.
Nope. The U.S. signed but never ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, so we're not bound by it. We did ratify the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963 which prohibits us from conducting atmospheric, aboveground, and underwater testing. We can go out into holes in the desert (also South Mississippi. Look it up.) and turn as much rock into radioactive glass as we wish as long as we do it far enough underground that it doesn't appreciably leak fission products.
We choose not to conduct underground testing even though we're not bound by treaty because 1) enriching nuclear material just to turn it into hot plasma in a test is fricking expensive, 2) We understand what's going on enough to work with simulations inside supercomputers for new designs, 3) seismic and electromagnetic signals from underground testing leak information about your weapons design to the rest of the world, 4) dealing with the sandworms is a goddamned hassle.
We still do set off warheads, though, for testing the design and readiness of the weapons. That's relatively cheap once you remove the cost of burning up your nuclear material. The warheads' nuclear cores are replaced with instrumented dummy cores. We know enough about the behavior of nuclear materials to predict the yield of the device (if a core were inserted) from the data measured by the dummy cores when the high explosive lenses are detonated.
This post was edited on 2/9/18 at 2:58 pm
Back to top
